Search for: "cf"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
Cf. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:19 am
It’s not nearly enough to just have a CFS diagnosis. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:28 am
The Patentee argued that the GensuPen had only been given out as part of a trial under conditions of confidentiality (Cf. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
12 May 2023, 1:23 pm
Cf. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:01 pm
Rev. 1865, 1875–1880, 1897–1902 (1987); cf. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:58 am
Socy. v Tooke, 293 AD2d 794, 798 [3d Dept 2002]; cf. [read post]
8 May 2023, 11:43 pm
Nevertheless, the Board is of the view that the Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G 1/21 puts certain limits on how this discretion is to be exercised.1.5 When interpreting Article 15a RPBA 2020, it must be borne in mind that provisions of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal are to be interpreted in a way that is compatible with the spirit and purpose of the Convention (cf. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:15 am
Borrowing from the 43rd episode of Seinfeld, entitled "The Pitch", today's post is about nothing. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Contrary to the [Respondents'] contention, the proceeding was not rendered academic by its post-commencement disclosure of records in response to some of the [Plaintiff] requests, since an actual controversy between the parties still exists concerning whether the [Plaintiff's] remaining requests are exempt from disclosure (see Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505; cf. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Contrary to the [Respondents'] contention, the proceeding was not rendered academic by its post-commencement disclosure of records in response to some of the [Plaintiff] requests, since an actual controversy between the parties still exists concerning whether the [Plaintiff's] remaining requests are exempt from disclosure (see Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505; cf. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:23 am
., 262 AD2d 226 [1st Dept 1999], lv dismissed 94 NY2d 791 [1999] [plaintiff granted judgment on Judiciary Law § 487 claim as defendant law firm knowingly withheld crucial information from court in underlying action]; cf Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696 [2d Dept 2018] [defendant attorney was properly denied summary dismissal of Judiciary Law § 487 claim based on allegations that he filed blatantly deficient accounting with court, which delayed administration of estate, andcaused estate… [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:27 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced on May 3, 2023, that it has filed a color additive petition (CAP 3C0325), submitted by the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), the Center for Environmental Health (CEH), the Center for Food Safety (CFS), the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), and the Environmental Working Group (EWG). 88 Fed. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Cf., e.g., Hancock v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:45 am
KG Land California Corp. (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1652, 1662 [when the nature of future changes are “nonspecific and uncertain, an EIR need not engage in ‘sheer speculation’ as to future environmental consequences”]; cf. [read post]
2 May 2023, 3:24 am
Although the provisions on international jurisdiction in the EUTMR are lex specialis in relation to the Brussels I Recast Regulation (cf. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:45 am
Cf. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 10:58 pm
Comment In assessing the similarity of figurative signs, it is helpful to remember that trade mark law does not grant a monopoly to a concept or idea but only to a specific expression of a concept or idea in a specific sign (cf. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
The New York State Division of Human Rights [Division], after a hearing, found that the Town [Employer] had unlawfully discriminated against the Complainant on the basis of her disability. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
The New York State Division of Human Rights [Division], after a hearing, found that the Town [Employer] had unlawfully discriminated against the Complainant on the basis of her disability. [read post]
