Search for: "cf"
Results 461 - 480
of 5,129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
But I do think the Dean should encourage such participation. [2] Cf. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:49 am
Strong leaders voluntarily initiate their own performance feedback. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
MGFB Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Losing the Opportunity to Chill Political and Ideological Participation and Organization by the Other Side [* * *] [1] Cf., e.g., Randall Kennedy & Eugene Volokh, The New Taboo: Quoting Epithets in the Classroom and Beyond, 49 Cap. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am
[The Supreme Court has never held that private delegations have any special unfavorable treatment under the Article I Nondelegation Doctrine: quite the opposite!] [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:53 pm
., “Plaintiff Alleges ‘Heart of the Himalayas’ Is in India, Not Pakistan (It’s in Nepal)” (Oct. 22, 2021); “‘Hint of Lime’ Case: It’s not Crunch Berries, But It’s Close” (June 16, 2021); cf. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:22 am
Insofar as the exculpatory clause is applicable to the Lau defendants’ actions taken in good faith as an escrow agent (cf. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 2:40 pm
Cf. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 8:41 am
I thought that maybe some university systems would have Mastodon servers that are less interested in content restrictions (cf. this story as to Zoom), but a quick search for university mastodon chiefly revealed the Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Cf. 87 Fed. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:05 am
Cf Post 332 (suggesting that most law firms default to a confederation model [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:15 am
Cf. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 3:45 am
Cf Post 323 (Patrick McKenna’s “rules of engagement” for high-performing legal teams). [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 4:18 pm
The North Carolina Supreme Court held last week in State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 3:56 am
Cf. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
Decision under appeal: added subject-matter, clarity and support by the description2.1 In Reasons 2.1 of the appealed decision, the examining division raised an objection under Article 123(2) EPC against feature (c) of claim 1 (cf. point V above). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:31 pm
Cf. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:02 am
Cf. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
") (emphasis in original); cf. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:53 am
., LLC, 913 A2d 572, 575, 578 [Del Ch 2006] [holding that plaintiff officer of defendant did not have a right to advancement of attorneys’ fees under subject agreements which promised to indemnify and hold harmless defendant’s officers but did not mention the word ‘advancement,’ and noting the contrast with other agreements which clearly provide for the payment of plaintiff’s ‘legal expenses as they are incurred’]; cf. [read post]
