Search for: "mark" Results 1 - 20 of 147,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2008, 5:07 pm
var addthis_pub="bevans1986";It's not just a trade mark infringement's a Marks and Spencer's trade mark infringement case. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 8:57 am by Neil Melliship
A Private Members Bill was introduced in Canada’s federal parliament yesterday, which, if passed, will result in significant amendments to the official mark provisions in the Trade-marks Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:02 am by David Canton
Where a sound mark is considered to be functional and/or clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, an objection will be raised pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 12(1)(b) of the Trade-marks Act. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 3:49 am
On Sept. 26, the Ninth Circuit found that a mark can be counterfeit even when the genuine mark is not used on the same goods. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:00 am by James Yang
Under the false marking statute (35 USC 292), a patentee may be liable up to $500 per falsely marked product. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 2:54 pm
Witness the following marks advertised in the Canadian Trade-marks Journal over the course of the last 3 months. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:08 am by Karen Monteith
An Order in Council has amended Schedule 2 of the Olympic and Paralympic Marks Act to add 38 new marks to the prohibited marks list. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 8:05 am by James Yang
The distinction between a service mark and a […] The post What is a service mark? [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:36 pm by Holly Brezee
The use is not by the mark owner in reference to the mark owner. 3. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am by war
More importantly, the Champagne Heidsieck[2] principle can be seen as an emanation of what US trade mark lawyers call “nominative use” or “nominative fair use”: one did not use a trade mark as a trade mark by using it to identify the goods or services marked with the trade mark by the trade mark owner. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:25 pm by Larry Munn
  Section 23(2) of the Act provides that only the owner of a certification mark may authorize others to use the mark in association with wares that meet the defined standard. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:25 pm
  Although marking is not required, it’s beneficial because marking serves as constructive notice to the world that the product is patented. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am by Neil Wilkof
With apologies to Hamlet--when is a mark a pattern mark? [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 9:27 pm by Ravi
Mitac stylised mio was not identical to the Singtel mark notwithstanding that phonetically the marks are identical. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:06 pm by James Yang
You may also be interested in Patent Marking. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:17 am by Larry
Rather, the marking rules already tell us that the origin for marking purposes is "Canada." [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:32 pm
Mark Fowler is a future thinker.Mark is Research Director and Co-Founder of The Global Foresight Network - an international consultancy to organisations wanting a pathway to their future.Today I spoke to Mark about the future and how we mediators may learn to think about our own destiny and take steps to make sure we get there intact.Here is the first part of that video interview over at the Mediation vBlog Project with part 2 to come and here is a detailed explanation of the… [read post]