Search for: "mark" Results 1 - 20 of 118,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2015, 3:52 am by Shireen Smith
A famous mark has a much broader scope of protection than an ordinary mark. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 11:27 pm
It would be a great message to the jihadis if Mark’s book debuted on the Times’ best-seller list and then zipped up to #1. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:07 pm
var addthis_pub="bevans1986";It's not just a trade mark infringement's a Marks and Spencer's trade mark infringement case. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 8:57 am by Neil Melliship
A Private Members Bill was introduced in Canada’s federal parliament yesterday, which, if passed, will result in significant amendments to the official mark provisions in the Trade-marks Act. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 3:49 am
On Sept. 26, the Ninth Circuit found that a mark can be counterfeit even when the genuine mark is not used on the same goods. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:00 am by James Yang
Under the false marking statute (35 USC 292), a patentee may be liable up to $500 per falsely marked product.   [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 2:54 pm
Witness the following marks advertised in the Canadian Trade-marks Journal over the course of the last 3 months. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:08 am by Karen Monteith
An Order in Council has amended Schedule 2 of the Olympic and Paralympic Marks Act to add 38 new marks to the prohibited marks list. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:25 pm by Larry Munn
Section 23(2) of the Act provides that only the owner of a certification mark may authorize others to use the mark in association with wares that meet the defined standard.  [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:27 pm by Jason
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am by war
More importantly, the Champagne Heidsieck[2] principle can be seen as an emanation of what US trade mark lawyers call “nominative use” or “nominative fair use”: one did not use a trade mark as a trade mark by using it to identify the goods or services marked with the trade mark by the trade mark owner. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 10:48 am by Fitapelli Kurta
According to his BrokerCheck report, Mark Beloyan has been sanctioned by FINRA. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:25 pm
  Although marking is not required, it’s beneficial because marking serves as constructive notice to the world that the product is patented. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 9:27 pm by Ravi
Mitac stylised mio was not identical to the Singtel mark notwithstanding that phonetically the marks are identical. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:17 am by Larry
Rather, the marking rules already tell us that the origin for marking purposes is "Canada." [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:06 pm by James Yang
You may also be interested in Patent Marking. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 5:10 pm by Dennis Crouch
Related Posts: False Marking Lawsuits Forest Group Decision Constitutionality of the False Marking Statute Patent Marking [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:45 am
On Friday 30 September 2009 the Court of First Instance decided that two trade mark applications for exclamation mark symbols (as shown on the left) are not distinctive enough to qualify for Community trade mark registration, (cases T-75/08 and T-191/08). [read post]