Search for: "mark" Results 1 - 20 of 150,816
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2008, 5:07 pm
var addthis_pub="bevans1986";It's not just a trade mark infringement case......it's a Marks and Spencer's trade mark infringement case. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 8:57 am by Neil Melliship
A Private Members Bill was introduced in Canada’s federal parliament yesterday, which, if passed, will result in significant amendments to the official mark provisions in the Trade-marks Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:02 am by David Canton
Where a sound mark is considered to be functional and/or clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, an objection will be raised pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 12(1)(b) of the Trade-marks Act. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 3:49 am
On Sept. 26, the Ninth Circuit found that a mark can be counterfeit even when the genuine mark is not used on the same goods. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:00 am by James Yang
Under the false marking statute (35 USC 292), a patentee may be liable up to $500 per falsely marked product. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 2:54 pm
Witness the following marks advertised in the Canadian Trade-marks Journal over the course of the last 3 months. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:08 am by Karen Monteith
An Order in Council has amended Schedule 2 of the Olympic and Paralympic Marks Act to add 38 new marks to the prohibited marks list. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 8:05 am by James Yang
The distinction between a service mark and a […] The post What is a service mark? [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:36 pm by Holly Brezee
The use is not by the mark owner in reference to the mark owner. 3. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am by war
More importantly, the Champagne Heidsieck[2] principle can be seen as an emanation of what US trade mark lawyers call “nominative use” or “nominative fair use”: one did not use a trade mark as a trade mark by using it to identify the goods or services marked with the trade mark by the trade mark owner. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:25 pm by Larry Munn
  Section 23(2) of the Act provides that only the owner of a certification mark may authorize others to use the mark in association with wares that meet the defined standard. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:25 pm
  Although marking is not required, it’s beneficial because marking serves as constructive notice to the world that the product is patented. [read post]
23 May 2023, 8:42 am by Holly
The post Concurrent Use Mark Registrations: Coexistence Among Multiple Users of the Same Mark appeared first on Business & Litigation Lawyers . [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am by Neil Wilkof
With apologies to Hamlet--when is a mark a pattern mark? [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 9:27 pm by Ravi
Mitac stylised mio was not identical to the Singtel mark notwithstanding that phonetically the marks are identical. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:06 pm by James Yang
You may also be interested in Patent Marking. [read post]