Search for: "mcneal" Results 181 - 200 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
., 928 Williams Avenue, Breukelen Houses, Brooklyn Michael McNeal Case 133/10 formerly associated with the 3rd fl., 3061 Avenue X, Sheephead Nostrand Houses, Brooklyn Prohibited as of January 27, 2010 Andre Malone Case 305/10 associated with the 5th fl., 251 Osborn Street, Brownsville Houses, Brooklyn Jose Deliz Case 3010/09 associated with the 3rd fl., 159-48 Harlem River Dr., Rangel Houses, Manhattan Nadine Smith Case 328/10 associated with the 10th fl., 128 Lewis… [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 4:15 am by Benjamin Wittes
And folks like Greg McNeal have done amazing work fleshing out targeting standards. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:19 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Greg McNeal responds to Bobby’s ruminations last week regarding whether autonomous robots may eventually be capable of capturing, rather than killing, targets at Forbes. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 10:55 am by Raffaela Wakeman
After attending the drone convention in Las Vegas, Greg McNeal ponders the question of whether the drone industry has the wherewithal to compete with the privacy lobby at Forbes. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
Timmie Lance McNeal, S157565.July 9, San Francisco, CAAccused drunk drivers now have more ammunition for challenging Breathalyzer findings as a result of a unanimous ruling Thursday by the California Supreme Court.The ruling is expected to make drunk-driving cases more complicated and possibly more difficult to prosecute, lawyers said. [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:53 am by Liskow & Lewis
For further information, contact Catherine Napolitano at cnapolitano@liskow.com or Rob McNeal at rbmcneal@liskow.com. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 3:52 am by Walter Olson
McNeal: This is also a lesson for people in other regulated industries. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm by Alex Vitrak
Paul Proposes Bill Requiring Warrants for Drone Use [Forbes – Greg McNeal]   Apple to Release New Tracking Tool for Apps [Wall Street Journal – Jessica E. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm by Susana Medeiros
Law Professor Gregory McNeal from Pepperdine School of Law recently published a report detailing the inconsistencies in states’ drone regulations. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:26 am by Kenneth Anderson
 (Thanks to Greg McNeal for digging out the language; Bobby also makes reference to this in his Awlaki article.) [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 10:56 am
I learned from Greg McNeal's Twitter thread (and related blog post) of an interesting opinion issued by the Michigan Court of Appeals last week in which the court found that the use of a drone by a township to take aerial photographs of private property violated the property owners' reasonable expectations of privacy.The case is Long Lake Township v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Robert Chesney
Thanks to Professor Greg McNeal at Pepperdine University School of Law, an interesting Justice Department policy document has come to light. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:41 am by Scott Riddle
See In re McNeal, 477 Fed.Appx. 562, 564 (11th Cir. 2012) ("Under our prior panel precedent rule, a later panel may depart from an earlier panel’s decision only when the intervening Supreme Court decision is ‘clearly on point. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:34 am by Erin Bambrick
  For more information regarding the decision, please contact Rob McNeal at rbmcneal@liskow.com or Erin Bambrick at ebambrick@liskow.com. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 6:38 am by Benjamin Bissell
The lively discussion featured Ben as moderator and Wells, John Villasenor, and Gregory McNeal as panelists. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:07 am by Michael DelSignore
McNeal, where it held that expert testimony on the scientific technique underlying breathalyzer tests is is inadmissible with respect to the more specific offense of driving with a BAC over 0.08 percent, but is only admissible with regard to the generic offense to rebut the presumption that the driver's BAC level was over 0.08 percent while driving. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:14 am by Raffaela Wakeman
In non-cyber news, here’s a refreshing beef with the NDAA that has nothing to do with its dentention provisions (set yourself straight on that here): Greg McNeal writes in Forbes about the new law’s implications for defense contractors should they fail to screen their equipment for counterfeit parts. [read post]