Search for: "v. Fritz et al" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
Bambauer, Saura Masconale, et. al., Reckless Associations, 36 Harv. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:47 am by Peter J. Sluka
The case is ALP, Inc. et ano. v Moskowitz, et al., Index No. 652326/2019 [Sup Ct NY County, June 14, 2021]. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:51 am by John Morken
Nor was it necessary to permit the foundation to participate in the proceeding, as the charitable interest under the propounded will was being adequately represented by the Attorney-General, who “has the statutory power and duty to represent the beneficiaries of any disposition for charitable purposes (EPTL 8-1.1(f); other cites omitted)” (Alco Gravure Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:51 am by John Morken
Nor was it necessary to permit the foundation to participate in the proceeding, as the charitable interest under the propounded will was being adequately represented by the Attorney-General, who “has the statutory power and duty to represent the beneficiaries of any disposition for charitable purposes (EPTL 8-1.1(f); other cites omitted)” (Alco Gravure Inc. et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Petra Moser (Stanford Dep’t of Economics)Topic: Measuring the Effects of Patents on Private Incentives, Commenting on: James Bessen et al., The Costs and Benefits of United States Patents (2014)Estimating private costs and benefits of US patents owned by publicly held firms. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:44 pm
Wildfox Couture, LLC and Amazon.com, et al 2011-cv-11-4141 PSG, in the U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  The Court of Appeals gives a definitive "no" answer, albeit with certain caveats, and in so doing explicitly disagrees with Littman et al. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
This case concerns a consolidated appeal by Sensations, Inc. et al. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:58 am
Co. et al"In this environmental cleanup insurance coverage action, special equities overcome the presumption favoring the first-filed action in New York and support proceeding in New Jersey. [read post]