Search for: "v. Oliver" Results 61 - 80 of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2014, 10:42 am by Mary Whisner
Clip from Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, Oct. 19, 2014.Oliver and his team didn't stop with a cute video of their own. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:45 pm by Mary Whisner
Clip from Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, Oct. 19, 2014.Oliver and his team didn't stop with a cute video of their own. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 4:25 am
Jane Lambert Appointed Person (Mr Martin Howe QC) Re Registered Design No 6045074, Lambretta Club Great Britain v Frankland BL 0-129-20 6 March 2020 This was an appeal to the Appointed Person by Mr Gavin Frankland against the decision of Mr Oliver Morris on behalf of the Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks in Re Registered Design No 6045074, Lambretta Club Great [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:05 am
Contents include: Oliver Diggelmann, Die Entstehung des modernen Völkerrechts in der frühen Neuzeit Andreas Their, Historische Semantiken von ius gentium und “Völkerrecht” Manfred Walther, Der Begriff des Völkerrechts bei Spinoza Michael J. [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:34 pm
Source Wikipedia In Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491, [1990] RPC 341, [1990] WLR 491, [1990] 1 All ER 873, [1990] UKHL 12, Lord Oliver said: "The law of passing off can be summarised in one short general [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Our previous  Trump v Twitter piece explained how s.230 gives both a shield and a sword to online providers like Twitter and Facebook, providing not only (1) that no provider shall be treated as the publisher of information provided by another (thereby protecting providers, as supposed mere platforms, from legal proceedings regarding what has been said by users on those platforms), but also (2) that where a provider does, in good faith, moderate what is published by American users,… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was sound. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
For those who have been promising themselves that they will listen to the full Supreme Court oral arguments in Obergefell v. [read post]