Posts tagged with: "litigation" Results 41 - 60 of 245,381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm by Accel Admin
That said, in some cases, litigation becomes inevitable. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm by Ilya Somin
But, in a recent Reason article, Ethan Blevins of the Pacific Legal Foundation—one of the nation's leading public interest law firms litigating takings cases—argues they also violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment: While pundits and lawyers cross swords over free speech on social media, a quieter yet critically important principle is being ignored: property rights. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am by Josh Blackman
I hope this concurrence has an impact on litigation in the Fifth Circuit, and elsewhere. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:15 am by Elizabeth M. Manno
In patent litigation, damages issues are sometimes treated as an afterthought when compared to the issues of infringement and invalidity. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:15 am by Elizabeth M. Manno
In patent litigation, damages issues are sometimes treated as an afterthought when compared to the issues of infringement and invalidity. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
SEXUALLY HARASSED EMPLOYEE TO GET OVER $56,000In early April, the franchisors of a Shane’s Rib Shack, out in Milledgeville, Georgia, have agreed to pay $56,500 to settlement sexual harassment and retaliation charges filed by the U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:56 am
For the rest of us, information relating to implementation (and later the politics and litigation around enforcement) requires substantial aid. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:43 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Last week was the occasion of the “spring meeting”; that is, the big annual antitrust convention in Washington, D.C. hosted by the American Bar Association (ABA) Antitrust Section. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:14 am by Class Action Defense
  McConnell  Duane Morris Takeaway: Class action litigation involving antitrust claims had several key developments in 2023, despite a relative lack of actual verdicts. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:14 am by Ellena Erskine
(Leo Shane III, Military Times) The Gaping Hole In Supreme Court Rules For Tracking Links Between Litigants And Influence Groups (Shawn Musgrave, The Intercept) Fetal Personhood Fight Underlies Supreme Court Abortion Case (Lydia Wheeler, Bloomberg Law)   The post The morning read for Thursday, April 18 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
The “disinterested and independent board majority” is one of the most important concepts in corporate law, because it is the fulcrum on which most corporate litigation turns. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
The “disinterested and independent board majority” is one of the most important concepts in corporate law, because it is the fulcrum on which most corporate litigation turns. [read post]
In recent months, the European Court of Justice (“CJEU”) issued five judgments providing some clarity on the scope of individuals’ rights to claim compensation for “material and non-material damage” under Article 82 of the GDPR. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:46 am by Simon Gibbs
Not only is it likely to generate unnecessary satellite litigation due to the uncertainty it has created, it is also likely to generate unnecessary […] The post Fixed fee transitional provisions for non-personal injury claims first appeared on Legal Costs Specialists - Gibbs Wyatt Stone. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:36 am by Kristen Matteucci
 With the goal of helping Self-Represented Litigants better prepare for court hearings and more confidently engage with the courts, these illustrated videos address topics like legal advice vs. legal information, what it means to file a motion, and what to do after being served. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:24 am by Joelle Boxer
PAK is considered a landmark abortion decision in Kenya, following a series of strategic litigation (including FIDA-Kenya and others v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
EMPLOYEE WORKED AT FIRM HIRED BY OPPOSING PARTYAfter a “damage expert” was disqualified from testifying in a New York County Supreme Court case due to a “conflict of interest,” an appeal ensued.And on its review of the record, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that an expert witness can be removed from a matter when it was reasonable for a party to think that a “confidential relationship” existed and that “confidential or privileged… [read post]