Posts tagged with: "supreme+court" Results 6221 - 6240 of 349,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
In the last few years, Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch have separately criticized existing constitutional limitations on liability for defamation as too broad, without any mention of the widespread existence and availability of insurance protecting against liability for defamation. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:29 am by Charlie Jarrett
It might not be until the Supreme Court has had a chance to review the new rule and associated lawsuits that the full impact of the noncompete ban is realized. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court has decided one blockbuster after another by appeal to “history and tradition,” deploying this trope to remake key features of the constitutional landscape: from overturning Roe to abolishing affirmative action, from narrowing the scope of public accommodations to widening the margin for church/state entanglements. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court in argued cases: The Court issued rulings in two argued cases. 1. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained… [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:40 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Black voters ask Supreme Court to back Louisiana’s congressional map in messy fight over race (John Fritze, Tierney Sneed, & Fredreka Schouten, CNN) Black Louisiana voters ask US supreme court to confirm congressional district (George Chidi, The Guardian)  Harris Warns of Supreme Court’s Future Rulings: ‘I Worry About Fundamental Freedoms’ (Lisa Lerer, The New York Times)… [read post]
In February 2024, the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador certified a privacy class action. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:13 am
A juvenile suspected of being either the shooter or an accomplice in a 2016 murder may be tried in adult court for felony murder, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
As Stormy Daniels gears up for her second day of testimony against former President Donald Trump inside a lower Manhattan courtroom, Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan will likely maintain his close watch over the proceedings. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
Lying to Congress is as American as cheating on your taxes or being a Republican nominee for the Supreme Court and assuring the Senate of your respect for precedent), being a turncoat- someone who said he would take a bullet for the defendant, before actually becoming the bullet that may take him down. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
We served as the primary authors of the report, with contributions and endorsements from dozens of world-leading jurists and scholars in the field, including founding prosecutors of the international criminal tribunals, former supreme court justices, and presidents of the International Association of Genocide Scholars. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:45 am by jonathanturley
The Supreme Court has agreed with Cannon that Smith’s desire to secure a conviction before the election is not the overriding consideration. [read post]