Posts tagged with: "supreme+court" Results 6281 - 6300 of 349,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
The panel found that the new district lines, drawn after a district court found the state needed to… Continue reading The post Louisiana to appeal court decision blocking use of its congressional maps to Supreme Court appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:00 am
POLICY DIDN’T COVER SUBCONTRACTOR'S WORKWhen WIC, an insurance company, sought a declaration from the New York County Supreme Court that it wasn’t obligated to defend its insured, SRDCSM, Inc., in a personal injury action brought by a subcontractor’s employee, relief was granted in WIC’s favor.On appeal, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that while the policy provided coverage for the “interior carpentry work” in question,… [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered March 30, 2023, dismissing plaintiff’s legal malpractice action in its entirety, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the judgment vacated, the complaint reinstated, plaintiff’s cross-motion for leave to amend granted, and the matter remanded for further proceedings. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Eolas is seeking a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court — hoping that the court will overturn the Federal Circuit’s decision invalidating its distributed computing (WWW) claims as ineligible under Alice Corp. and Mayo and ostensibly under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am by jonathanturley
In a 1984 pornography case, Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart wrote “I shall not today attempt further to define [obscenity]. . . . [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:23 am by Imke Ratschko
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of New York County may provide some relief for small business owners who have been hit with lawsuits alleging that their websites are not accessible to individuals with disabilities. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
”...Moving to plaintiffs' free expression claim, the court rejected the state's reliance on the exception found in the Supreme Court's 1949 Giboney decision for speech integral to unlawful conduct. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
" One theory is that he is auditioning for the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
The post Today in Supreme Court History: May 8, 1884 appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:00 pm
ATTORNEY’S SUBMISSION WAS “CONCLUSORY” IN NATUREWhen his motion to vacate a default judgment was denied by the New York County Supreme Court, F.E. appealed.On its review on the record, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that F.E.'s application was only supported by his counsel’s affidavit -- which was characterized as “conclusory” in nature, and not predicated on any “personal knowledge. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:04 pm by News Desk
The case will now be moved to the Supreme Court of Victoria for trial, with the first hearing set for later this month. [read post]
Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story stated, “the law is a jealous mistress and requires a long and constant courtship. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:25 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Jones, RonNell Andersen and West, Sonja, Supreme Court Ideology and the Press (March 15, 2024). [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:25 pm by Anthony Co
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Mortensen remains unchallenged in this jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court has not reviewed the issue. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm by Michael Lowe
  And of course, this has been taken up for review to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). [read post]