Posts tagged with: "supreme+court" Results 6401 - 6420 of 349,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
The Delaware Supreme Court doesn’t appear to be seeing eye-to-eye with the Chancery Court when it comes to disclosure of advisor conflicts. [read post]
6 May 2024, 12:14 am by admin
Supreme Court overruled the prior standard of proof: Did your communication seem threatening to the recipient? [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:00 pm
DOCTOR’S CRIMINAL CONDUCT NEGATED COVERAGEWhen Lloyds of London went to the New York County Supreme Court to declare certain disability insurance policies invalid because of “material misrepresentations” made on applications by “Dr. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
He has framed those responses as contrasting to what happened after the January 6 insurrection.As USA Today puts it, “Trump has suggested that officials might not prosecute the kinds of demonstrators who took over, barricaded, and vandalized a building at Columbia….In condemning the college demonstrators, Trump said this week: ‘I wonder if what’s going to happen to them will be anything comparable to what happened to J6, because they’re doing a lot of destruction,… [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:11 pm by Francis Pileggi
  But the Supreme Court  said, in those key cases, “the common thread running through our decisions: a heightened concern for self- dealing when a controlling stockholder stands on both sides of a transaction. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:05 pm by Ilya Somin
Supreme Court rightly rejected last year as justification for racial preferences. [read post]
After the Supreme Court ruled that the plan was unlawful in December, the government introduced its Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 which recently received royal assent. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am by Eric Goldman
Instead, the Supreme Court gave us only the barest-bones outline of a legal test that answers virtually no question that matters, so the lower courts will reach heterogeneous results and the issue will inevitably make its way back to the Supreme Court again. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am by SHG
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.The post Today in Supreme Court History: May 5, 1992 appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:31 am by Immigration Prof
Protecting the Vulnerable in the Twenty-First Century: An International Perspective by Justice Susan Glazebrook, New Zealand Supreme Court Abstract While the Refugee Convention has been the main mechanism for protecting those fleeing harm in the twentieth century, this paper seeks... [read post]
4 May 2024, 2:00 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  And so he argues that, if the jury identifies those elements of another criminal law as having been satisfied, that is not "another crime" if there would be a First Amendment defense to liability for those elements independently — either under current law, or, if needed, on a better understanding of law as changed by the Supreme Court on appeal from Trump's conviction by overturning the Court's precedent. [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm by David Bernstein
According to the Supreme Court, the government cannot favor certain kinds of protests over others. [read post]
4 May 2024, 12:08 pm by Gene Takagi
President and Fellows of Harvard College, the Supreme Court held that affirmative action in college admissions violates the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
4 May 2024, 11:09 am by Eugene Volokh
… In the context of split-second excessive force cases, the Supreme Court has "repeatedly told courts not to define clearly established law at too high a level of generality. [read post]
4 May 2024, 10:44 am by Michel-Adrien
Arrêt sur le droit is a relatively new French-language podcast whose goal is to help people better understand decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada.It is co-produced by the Bar Association of Montreal and CAIJ (the free legal information portal of the Quebec Bar Association) in collaboration with the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]