Posts tagged with: "supreme+court"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 349,241
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Partner Julie Stapel and associate Naina Kamath co-wrote a Law360 Expert Analysis column discussing potential implications for Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) regulations if the US Supreme Court ends the Chevron deference. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Partner Julie Stapel and associate Naina Kamath co-wrote a Law360 Expert Analysis column discussing potential implications for Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) regulations if the US Supreme Court ends the Chevron deference. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:52 pm
Fourth, other provisions of the Section 331 reflect that the Judicial Conference can propose "changes" and "additions" to rules in federal courts, but those recommendations would be made to the Supreme Court for adoption. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:57 pm
Indeed, Judge Kacsmaryk has had several cases up at the Supreme Court in recent years that have been reversed/stayed/vacated. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:25 pm
That gap has grown faster in the places that, until the Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm
“Oral Arguments Set in Monuments Case Aimed at Supreme Court; Arguments scheduled for September in Antiquities Act challenge; Justice Roberts has questioned creation of large monuments”: Bobby Magill of Bloomberg Law has this report. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:57 pm
And Kyle Cheney of Politico reports that “Appeals court rejects Peter Navarro’s bid to stave off jail time; Unless the Supreme Court intervenes, the former Trump adviser is slated to report to prison on March 19. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:51 pm
Hoya: Georgetown Law Professors Cole & Katyal to Face Off at Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
The Purcell principle, named after the Supreme Court case Purcell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
The Supreme Court has used these policy arguments to resolve and craft rules for many free speech dilemmas. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 2:46 pm
Supreme Court noted in in 2020, “[e]very citizen is presumed to know the law, and it needs no argument to show that all should have free access” to it. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:05 pm
Supreme Court in Chevron, USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 12:07 pm
The Society of Family Planning, a health research organization, found that the average number of abortions in the state increased by about 36 percent in the year after the Supreme Court decision.Last year, Gov. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 11:35 am
Judge Luttig and Laurence Tribe in the Altantic: The Supreme Court of the United States did a grave disservice to both the Constitution and the nation in Trump v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 11:16 am
PHILIP HAMBURGER: Next Monday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:57 am
The piece delves deep into the details of both the per curiam and the separate opinion by the three liberals on… Continue reading The post Can Congress Disqualify Trump After the Supreme Court’s Section 3 Ruling? [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:55 am
By contrast, APA and constitutional law issues are reviewed de novo, and channels exist to seek emergency stays from the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:18 am
“Can Congress Disqualify Trump After the Supreme Court’s Section 3 Ruling? [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:16 am
This year’s keynote speaker is Bridget Mary McCormack, former chief justice of the Michigan Supreme Court and now president and CEO of the American Arbitration Association. [read post]
