Posts tagged with: "supreme+court"
Results 81 - 100
of 348,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
The litigants finally have a conflict in appellate court rulings that eventually will result in a Supreme Court appeal and the opportunity for the conservative majority there to issue yet another order framed as rightsizing the administrative state. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:05 am
Arkansas Advocate reports on the Court Order. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
Justice Arthur GoldbergThe post Today in Supreme Court History: July 25, 1965 appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
., July 24, 2024), an equally divided New Jersey Supreme Court decision resulted in affirmance through a short per curiam opinion of the dismissal of defamation claims brought against an Orthodox Jewish school by a Judaic Studies teacher whose employment by the school was terminated. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
They also contrast sharply with the Supreme Court of Canada’s directives in R v Gladue, [1999] 1 SCR 688 and R v Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, which expects judges to consider systemic background factors at all stages of the criminal process. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
Congressional Candidate Sentenced for Using Campaign Donations to Pay Debts” by Susannah Sudborough (MassLive) for MSN Hawaii: “Hawaii Contractors Are Still Big Contributors to Political Campaigns, Thanks to Loopholes in State Law” by Blaze Lovell for Honolulu Civil Beat Maine: “Republican Lawmaker Escapes Penalty for Repeatedly Missing Campaign Finance Deadlines” by Randy Billings (Portland Press Herald) for Yahoo News… [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:01 am
That said, lastly, it is unlikely that the Supreme Court will hear the ‘Birkenstock’ case before having decided ‘USM Haller’. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 11:00 pm
And when the Queens County Supreme Court denied that request, an appeal followed.On its review of the record, the Appellate Division, Second Department, noted that since Z.G. had demonstrated (via an expert’s affidavit) that the defendants had veered from the “accepted standard of care” -- by, among other things, not using an irrigating solution to minimize damage to Z.G. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm
Thus, for example, the United States Supreme Court has embarked upon an historical turn that implicates the work of trained historians. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held in Becerra v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in the famous United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:51 pm
Supreme Court grants limited appeal of ruling striking down Pittsburgh’s ‘jock tax. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:42 pm
“Supreme Court’s Hand-Picked Advocate Argues for Killing Richard Glossip; Oklahoma’s attorney general believes Glossip’s conviction should be overturned; Chief Justice John Roberts chose a former clerk to argue that the AG is wrong”: Liliana Segura and Jordan Smith of The Intercept have this report. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 5:58 pm
Three moves this week show how the real lesson of this Supreme Court term isn’t what most journalists were writing about. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 5:54 pm
“KY clerk who denied marriage licenses to gay couples wants Supreme Court ruling overturned”: Karla Ward of The Lexington Herald Leader has a report that begins, “Former Rowan County clerk Kim Davis is arguing in federal appeals court that the Supreme Court decision on gay marriage should be overturned, and she should not have to pay a judgment to one of the couples she denied a marriage license. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:30 pm
Washington Post columnist Monica Hesse recently highlighted an episode from Harris's career that illustrates the problem: Listen, nearly everything you need to know about the presidential candidacy of Kamala Harris can be summed up by 19 words she uttered at the 2018 confirmation hearings of Supreme Court Justice Brett M. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:17 pm
Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm
It was the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 1:31 pm
Lady Hale said in the Supreme Court case of Gallagher:“The foundation of the principle of legality is the rule of law itself - that people are to be governed by laws not men. [read post]
