Posts tagged with: "supreme+court" Results 81 - 100 of 259,887
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2019, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
. ____ (Supreme Court 2019) In a short, unanimous decision, the Supreme Court has upheld the “American Rule” of fee shifting — holding that the “all expenses of the proceedings” provision of § 145 does not authorize reimbursement of PTO attorney/paralegal costs associated with working on the case. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:20 am by Brian Hauss
The Supreme Court has made clear that “an author’s decision to remain anonymous, like other decisions concerning omissions or additions to the content of a publication, is an aspect of freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am by Samantha Fry
December 13, 2019 – Supreme Court could determine whether to hear case. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:15 am by Lawrence Solum
This article examines the history and purposes behind the single-subject rule; recent state supreme court cases interpreting it; and the arguments for reframing the rule more tightly around the prevention of logrolling or riders. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:10 am by Jessica Arons
And after Trump was able to put two new justices who are hostile to abortion rights on the Supreme Court, politicians decided to go for broke. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:09 am by Tate Brown
The US Supreme Court issued its ruling Wednesday in Peter v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 7:44 am by Legal Profession Prof
The New Jersey Supreme Court has accepted an attorney's consent to disbarment. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 7:06 am by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court in an argued case: Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Peter v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 6:39 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Ohio Supreme Court has reinstated a suspended former judge. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 6:36 am by Fred Rocafort
Furthermore, the Supreme People’s Court “emphasizes that the court should provide judicial guarantees for certain political goals” and “maintain social order and economic order”. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 6:06 am by Charles Edel
Fearful of the potential for unlimited, arbitrary or tyrannical exercise of power by an unprincipled president, the Constitution’s authors allowed Congress to remove a president before the completion of his term if a sufficient number of lawmakers concluded that the president had committed “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 5:53 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In this case, the Colorado Supreme Court overturned the court of appeals' conclusion that even though the purported purpose of the taking was to provide future possible public infrastructure, the overwhelming private benefit today meant the taking was not for public use. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 5:51 am
., the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the FWW method does not comply with the PMWA. [read post]