Posts tagged with: "supreme+court" Results 141 - 160 of 345,324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
He correctly states that, although a court may determine whether a belief is genuinely held, it is not for the courts to determine whether a belief is genuine (para 134). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This article adds to the growing body of scholarship addressing the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard (SFFA) that effectively ended race-conscious affirmative action in college admissions as we know it. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
., after a “note of issue” was filed -- the plaintiff was served with a “notice to admit,” wherein the defendant was asking the plaintiff to “to admit or deny whether the appended photos were a ‘fair and/or correct representation’ of screen shots” taken from various social media accounts.After the plaintiff’s request for an order of protection was denied by the New York County Supreme Court, he appealed. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled on April 17 that any “disadvantageous” change in the “terms and conditions” of employment that is based on race, gender, or another protected characteristic is actionable under Title VII, even if the disadvantage is not considered significant or material. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled on April 17 that any “disadvantageous” change in the “terms and conditions” of employment that is based on race, gender, or another protected characteristic is actionable under Title VII, even if the disadvantage is not considered significant or material. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled on April 17 that any “disadvantageous” change in the “terms and conditions” of employment that is based on race, gender, or another protected characteristic is actionable under Title VII, even if the disadvantage is not considered significant or material. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled on April 17 that any “disadvantageous” change in the “terms and conditions” of employment that is based on race, gender, or another protected characteristic is actionable under Title VII, even if the disadvantage is not considered significant or material. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled on April 17 that any “disadvantageous” change in the “terms and conditions” of employment that is based on race, gender, or another protected characteristic is actionable under Title VII, even if the disadvantage is not considered significant or material. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled on April 17 that any “disadvantageous” change in the “terms and conditions” of employment that is based on race, gender, or another protected characteristic is actionable under Title VII, even if the disadvantage is not considered significant or material. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Supreme Court granted a request from Idaho seeking to temporarily reinstate a state law banning gender-affirming care for minors. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“To date, neither the Supreme Court nor any of our sister circuits have addressed whether the compelled use of a biometric to unlock an electronic device is testimonial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:20 pm by Howard Bashman
The post “Oregon city forces Supreme Court to contend with national homelessness crisis; The high court will balance a city’s police power against the rights of the unhoused” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:17 pm by Justin Davidson (HK)
On January 17, 2024, the Supreme People’s Court of China (“SPC”) published its decision upholding a ruling in favor of Sennics Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:17 pm by Justin Davidson (HK)
On January 17, 2024, the Supreme People’s Court of China (“SPC”) published its decision upholding a ruling in favor of Sennics Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm by Mark Ashton
Supreme Court ruled that criminal proceedings must be open to public scrutiny and that civil proceedings were presumptively open. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:04 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s recent decision on “true threats” and the... [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The interview won Wilkinson a silver Logie, but her acceptance speech was considered by the ACT Supreme Court to be so prejudicial in favour of Higgins as to amount to trial by media. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm by Daly Barnett
Between May 2022 when the Supreme Court accidentally leaked the draft memo and the following June when the case was decided, there was a mad scramble to figure out what the impacts would be. [read post]