Search for: ""Rapanos v. United States" OR "547 U.S. 715"" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
United States, 547 U.S. 715[2] — a fractured decision in which no opinion gathered the support of a majority of the Court. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), the Court held that the Clean Water Act does not regulate all wetlands, but no opinion explaining why that is so garnered a majority of the Court. [read post]
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), ephemeral streams and many wetlands require a fact-specific “significant nexus” analysis by the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 10:13 am by Gail Suchman
The provisions of the rule may be found at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-01/documents/navigable_waters_protection_rule_prepbulication.pdf.[2] 547 U.S. 715 (2006); see also United States v, Riverside Bayview, 474 U.S. 121 (1985), Solid Waste Agency of N. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 12:28 pm by Stuart Kaplow
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) decision were clear the agencies exceeded their authority but split on how this was to be accomplished. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm by Joseph Koncelik
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) where Justice Kennedy created the “significant nexus” test for determining whether streams and/or wetlands were protected under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm by Joseph Koncelik
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) where Justice Kennedy created the “significant nexus” test for determining whether streams and/or wetlands were protected under the Clean Water Act. [read post]