Search for: "Akorn Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Akorn Inc., et al.1 mapped out one means by which a court may evaluate mootness fees paid to individual shareholders after the voluntary dismissal of an action challenging a public company merger. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am
Green Farms, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:57 am
Similarly, as discussed here, in 2019 a Illinois federal judge revoked a $322,000 attorneys’ fees to be paid to the plaintiffs’ lawyers in connection with a separate lawsuit (also filed by the Monteverde law firm) in connection with Akorn, Inc’s planned merger with Fresnius Kabi AG. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:29 pm
Akorn, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 1:39 pm
From Fried Frank: Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:54 pm
ColosimoThe CLS Blue Sky Blog Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 6:20 am
In so holding, Chancellor Andre Bouchard signaled that last year’s Court of Chancery decision in Akorn, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 6:52 am
As is typically the case, the agreement did not define what is "material" for purposes of a material adverse effect, so the court turned to Delaware cases holding that the effect should "substantially threaten the overall earnings potential of the target in a durationally significant manner" (Akorn, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 2:37 pm
” In Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 1:53 pm
Ted Frank, an Akorn shareholder, moved to intervene and object to the fee. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Akorn, Inc., No. 18-1418 (propriety of R.36 judgments; obviousness) Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:02 am
Akorn, Inc., No. 18-1418 (Whether no-opinion judgments comply with 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 12:59 pm
Durkin, exercising his “inherent authority” and acting at the urging of an objecting shareholder, has “abrogated” the settlement of the litigation arising out of the acquisition of Akorn , Inc. by Frensenius Kabi AG, and ordered the plaintiffs’ lawyers to return to Akorn their $322,000 mootness fee, ruling that the additional disclosures to which the company agreed were “worthless to shareholders” and that the underlying… [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Akorn, Inc., Consol. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 4:12 pm
Durkin, exercising his “inherent authority” and acting at the urging of an objecting shareholder, has “abrogated” the settlement of the litigation arising out of the acquisition of Akorn , Inc. by Frensenius Kabi AG, and ordered the plaintiffs’ lawyers to return to Akorn their $322,000 mootness fee, ruling that the additional disclosures to which the company agreed were “worthless to shareholders” and that the underlying… [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Akorn, Inc., No. 18-1418 (R.36 judgments; holistic approach to obviousness) Glasswall Solutions Limited, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Aruba Networks, Inc., C.A. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:24 am
Akorn, Inc., No. 18-1418 (Supreme Court 2019) with the following two questions: Whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
