Search for: "Andrx Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2023, 11:32 am
ALZA Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 4:58 pm
ALZA Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 2:58 pm
Andrx Pharm. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:00 pm
’” ALZA Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:44 am
Andrx Corp., 369 F.3d 700 (3d Cir. 2000), held that the first level of hearsay—employees recounting customer statements evincing confusion—aren’t excludable hearsay because they aren’t submitted for their truth, but rather for their error. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 5:54 am
Andrx Corp., 369 F.3d 700, 711 (3d Cir. 2004), the Court concluded that AstraZeneca had carried its burden to prove that it would likely succeed on the merits of the case pursuant to the Lapp factors analysis, that it would likely suffer “irreparable harm” if the requested relief was not granted, and that the balance of hardships and the public interest weigh in its favor. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm
Andrx Corp., 369 F.3d 700, 711 (3d Cir. 2004), the Court concluded that AstraZeneca had carried its burden to prove that it would likely succeed on the merits of the case, that it would likely suffer “irreparable harm” if the requested relief was not granted, and that the balance of hardships and the public interest weigh in its favor. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:07 am
Elan Corp. v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:59 pm
.; Andrx Corp.; Actavis Inc.; Actavis Pharma Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
This post examines a decision by a U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:14 pm
.; Andrx Corp.; Actavis Inc.; Actavis Pharma Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
Andrx Pharms., Inc., 239 F.3d 1297, 1301–02 (Fed. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
Festo Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
MagSil Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
Andrx Corp., the Federal Circuit added some needed clarity to the concept of the “presumption of validity” in patent law, and did so in a way that may be helpful to accused infringers who are arguing that the prior art (technology already disclosed in a patent or in the public domain) renders a patent invalid. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:26 pm
See Andrx Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:54 pm
Elan Corp., 421 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2005). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
Andrx Pharm., LLC, 603 F.3d 935, 940 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:58 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:26 pm
Biovail Corp. [read post]
