Search for: "Apple New England, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am by Florian Mueller
Apple FRAND determination by Mr Justice Marcus Smith (High Court of Justice, England and Wales) has been my most popular patent-related blog post in recent months. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The main course 4) Optis turkey with secret sauce In Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others [2022] EWCA Civ 1411 (27 October 2022) Meade J’s approach at the High Court was upheld by Arnold LJ. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 9:19 am by Josh Fensterbush
– Israel: May 23, 2022JDM Distributors – United Kingdom (England): May 26, 2022DKSH South East Asia Pte. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Barilaro v Google llc ([2022] FCA 650) Google was ordered to pay former New South Wales deputy premier John Barilaro $715,000 over a series of “racist” and “abusive” videos published on the YouTube channel Friendlyjordies. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 am by Bill Marler
– Israel: May 23, 2022JDM Distributors – United Kingdom (England): May 26, 2022DKSH South East Asia Pte. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 3:58 am by Drew Falkenstein
– Israel: May 23, 2022JDM Distributors – United Kingdom (England): May 26, 2022DKSH South East Asia Pte. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:53 pm by Josh Fensterbush
– Israel:-May 23, 2022 JDM Distributors – United Kingdom (England):-May 26, 2022 DKSH South East Asia Pte. [read post]
21 May 2022, 3:43 am by INFORRM
Google LLCDecision Date: November 10, 2021 The UK Supreme Court unanimously held that Google was not liable to pay damages for unlawfully collecting data from millions of Apple iPhone users in England and Wales. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 2:05 am by Editors
(Boston, MA) Senior Counsel, New Energy Equity, LLC (Annapolis, MD) Corporate Counsel, Tempus Labs (Chicago, IL) Sr. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Reuters, ITV News and the Sydney Morning Herald report the story. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The novelty of the claim arose since Lloyd was not just claiming damages in his own right; the claim was brought as a representative action, representing everyone resident in England and Wales who owned an Apple iPhone at the relevant time and whose data were obtained by Google without their consent. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am by CMS
The claim alleged that between August 2011 and February 2012, Google breached its duties as a data controller to over 4 million Apple iPhone users resident in England and Wales. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down by Dame Sharp, Lauing LJ and Warby LJ in Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1952 on 21 December 2021. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:10 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The claim is based on the factual allegation that, for several months in late 2011 and early 2012, the Appellant secretly tracked the internet activity of some 4 million of Apple iPhone users in England and Wales and used the data collected without the users’ knowledge or consent for commercial purposes (by enabling advertisers to target advertisements at users based on their browsing history). [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:20 am by Kristian Soltes
Earlier this year, a surcharging ban in Kansas was struck down after CardX LLC, a surcharging-services provider, filed suit against it. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The government has now confirmed that it will switch to the model preferred by Apple and Google. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:00 am by Victor Medina
[laughs] In Wales ‑‑ and you got to leave it up to England to come up with this ‑‑ there is a 20‑bed, all‑male wing called Derwen Ward. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 8:52 am by admin
In the case of Stachulski v Apple New England, LLC, for example, a jury awarded the plaintiff $750,000 in damages as a result of his exposure to salmonella. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:03 am by Dean Freeman
Apple New England, LLC, resulted with the New Hampshire Supreme Court, which affirmed a damage award of $750,000 in favor of a plaintiff who fell ill with salmonella after consuming a hamburger at defendant restaurant. [read post]