Search for: "BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
As I will explain, I think understanding this business rule is crucial to understanding the scope of the current royalty audit of the MLC by Bridgeport Music, at least potentially, and everyone else who audits the MLC. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 7:51 am
First up is Bridgeport Music, Inc. for the period January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2023. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:23 pm
Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
Rock on the River, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Wisconsin – December 29th, 2017) involves an assault that occurred at a music festival in Bridgeport, Wisconsin. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:28 am
While copyrighted sound recordings have been protected for over forty years by the Copyright Act of 1976, whether digital sampling constitutes copyright infringement may now depend on where in the country a copyright infringement case is litigated.For over ten years, Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
Bridgeport Music, Inc, in which the estate of Marvin Gaye sued Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams for copyright infringement in the hit song “Blurred Lines,” alleging that the music was too similar to that of Gaye’s famous “Got to Give It Up. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
N.W.A. - "100 Miles and Runnin"(2005) Almost 15 years later, that standard was taken to a new extreme in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:45 am
In its 2005 Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:45 am
In its 2005 Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 7:45 am
And just exactly what is the Sixth Circuit’s radical holding in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:11 am
* Ninth Circuit Finds De Minimis Sampling of Sound Recordings Non-Infringing The Ninth Circuit has rejected the 2005 Bridgeport Music Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:35 am
The Ninth Circuit has rejected the 2005 Bridgeport Music Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 3:52 pm
Under the 2005 Sixth Circuit ruling in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 3:29 pm
” Notably, this decision directly contradicts an earlier ruling by the Sixth Circuit in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:02 am
With respect to sampling sound recordings, the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:51 am
Case 1:13-cv-07874-LAK Bridgeport Music, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Axanar Productions, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
Bridgeport Music, Inc., No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
Clark accuses Frank of sidestepping the “musical analysis” altogether—but Frank never returns to the musical issue itself. [read post]
