Search for: "Barrett et al v. Downes et al" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:25 am by Josh Blackman
In any event, Roberts and (possibly) Kavanaugh are not on the same page as Rehnquist, et al. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
This court comes down on the 1595 side, so constructive knowledge of sex trafficking victimization defeats the Section 230 defense. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:58 am by Josh Blackman
Randolph, et al. for leave to intervene as respondents are dismissed as moot. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
The result was a hodgepodge of conflicting opinions and at least four main treatments described by then-Judge Barrett in Gadelhak v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Instead, this 40% magnitude of reduction results only in a loss of chance which is not compensable in medical malpractice cases (See: Cottrelle et al v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
That issue can arise, as it does in the new case of Armour, et al., v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]