Search for: "Brooke Holdings, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 7:03 am by Eric Fruits
Justice Department (DOJ) announced yesterday that it has filed suit, along with 29 states and the District of Columbia, charging Live Nation Entertainment Inc. and its subsidiary Ticketmaster LLC with monopolizing the live-events industry in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:23 am by Rob Robinson
One featured expert was Hal Brooks, Chief Executive Officer at HaystackID. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Consistent with that principle, courts in recent years have invalidated broad election-lie statutes in North Carolina, Ohio, Minnesota, and Massachusetts, holding that they are insufficiently clear and narrow to survive First Amendment scrutiny. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Gallagher Rolls Out ‘Retroactive Foreign Agents Registration Act’ with Bipartisan Support Yahoo News – Brooke Singman (Fox News) | Published: 7/11/2023 Rep. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Mo Brooks, January 6, and the Effort to Overturn an Election, (Nov. 9, 2021) 12. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am by Gene Takagi
President & Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On June 17, 1963, the Supreme Court sided with the DOJ, holding that the merger violated section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]