Search for: "C & F Aviation, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2023, 5:12 am by Chip Merlin
Midwest Motor Express, Inc., 181 F.3d 799, 808 (7th Cir. 1999) (‘Arguments not developed in any meaningful way are waived. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Given FDR’s antipathy to competition, had the Supreme Court not declared the NIRA unconstitutional in 1935, U.S. antitrust might have been extinguished as a result of FDR’s all-time record-setting dozen years in office. 1937-1943: Robert Jackson and Thurman Arnold – An Antitrust Revival Instead, antitrust (including the FTC) was rescued, revived, and launched into a highly aggressive phase by unpredictable developments: in 1937, FDR was persuaded to reverse course and support… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Another excerpt from the First Amendment section of my Social Media as Common Carriers? [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
This includes courts in California, Delaware, Illinois, New York, and Washington.[26] To determine which category a letter of intent falls under, courts examine the intentions of the parties.[27] In fact, the primary factor of all letter of intent analysis is the intentions of the parties.[28] Intent is the “touchstone” upon which letter of intent litigation hinges.[29] C. [read post]
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking for purely… [read post]