Search for: "DOES I-XX"
Results 1 - 20
of 403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
To answer that question, it is necessary to go back and understand how the statutory presumption actually came about, to think about what it does and does not do, and to analyse what is really going on when courts are making decisions about contact against a backdrop of proven domestic abuse. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am
In Mary XX, the Third Department explained that a guardian could compel an accounting from an agent when four factors exist: (i) a fiduciary relationship, (ii) entrustment of money or property, (iii) no other remedy, and (iv) a demand and refusal of an accounting (Matter of Mary XX., 33 AD3d 1066 [3d Dept 2006]). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:03 am
" One thing it does add is a clear statement that any interpretation must "take into account the evolutionary nature of the digital technologies," which probably would have been taken into account anyway, but I guess you never know for sure. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:03 am
" One thing it does add is a clear statement that any interpretation must "take into account the evolutionary nature of the digital technologies," which probably would have been taken into account anyway, but I guess you never know for sure. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 1:25 am
And finally… This from “Hairstyles”, one of our regular spammers: “When I originally commented I clicked the ‘Notify me when new comments are added’ checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get three e-mails with the same comment. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 9:05 am
Specifically, Mexico invoked Articles XX(a) and XX(g): 1. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 9:05 am
Specifically, Mexico invoked Articles XX(a) and XX(g): 1. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The CTA regulates “reporting company[ies],” defined as “corporation[s],limited liability company[ies], or other similar entit[ies]” that are either “(i) createdby the filing of a document with a secretary of state or a similar office under the lawof a State or Indian Tribe, or (ii) formed under the law of a foreign country andregistered to do business in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
While some might find that problematic (Soviet subsidies and the like), I believe that the choice is sound. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm
I would like to thank the authors for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:07 am
I will repeat here what I said last year. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:54 am
Second, I think the non-discrimination standard in paragraph 3(a), borrowed from the Article XX chapeau, is a useful way of rooting out disguised protectionism. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:54 am
Second, I think the non-discrimination standard in paragraph 3(a), borrowed from the Article XX chapeau, is a useful way of rooting out disguised protectionism. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
“ New Zealand launched a complaint against Canada pursuant to the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP),[i] taking issue with its lack of “promised access” to its otherwise restricted dairy market. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:20 am
In this paper I offer an analysis of this regime: the regulatory gap the EU regulation reacts to and the new regime’s compliance with international disciplines. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:20 am
In this paper I offer an analysis of this regime: the regulatory gap the EU regulation reacts to and the new regime’s compliance with international disciplines. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
[xx] Another crucial point is to our mind the use of the post-investigation period (IP) data, i.e. the data which the EC may collect after the initiation of the AS/AD proceeding. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
[xx] Another crucial point is to our mind the use of the post-investigation period (IP) data, i.e. the data which the EC may collect after the initiation of the AS/AD proceeding. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:20 am
[xx] It was referred to the House Education and the Workforce committee. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
The CBDR-RC requirement, even if defined loosely, expressly permits non-Annex I countries to have lower commitments than Annex I countries. [read post]
