Search for: "Dept. of Community Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Under CPLR 7511 (b) an arbitration award must be vacated if, as relevant here, a party's rights were impaired by an arbitrator who 'exceeded [their] power' " (Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, 90 [2010], quoting CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Under CPLR 7511 (b) an arbitration award must be vacated if, as relevant here, a party's rights were impaired by an arbitrator who 'exceeded [their] power' " (Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, 90 [2010], quoting CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 pm by Joanna Herzik
The “client” communicated with the attorney’s paralegal. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
When the court was presented with this “combining” issue using the 2005 PDRS in the case of Dept. of Corrections v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Jan. 5, Jan. 12 and Jan. 19 conferences) Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Claimants were civil service employees who worked full time as instructors or teachers for incarcerated individuals, or educational supervisors, at facilities operated by the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (hereinafter DOCCS). [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Claimants were civil service employees who worked full time as instructors or teachers for incarcerated individuals, or educational supervisors, at facilities operated by the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (hereinafter DOCCS). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:10 pm by Ann Pearson
If you’re a paralegal and you’ve asked yourself, where do I want to take my career from here or if you’ve ever questioned if the skills that you’re obtaining as a paralegal working in a law firm could eventually transfer to a career that’s outside the typical law firm this interview will give you great insights. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm by Stephen Halbrook
" The six-person Bruen majority also relied on a dissenting statement by Chief Justice Roberts, in Sprint Communications v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
State of California, Dept. of Motor Vehicles (June 22, 2023) (“Nunes I”) 88 Cal. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:26 am by Joanna Herzik
The “client” communicated with the attorney’s paralegal. [read post]