Search for: "Disability Rights Mississippi"
Results 1 - 20
of 355
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 10:26 am
According to a press release regarding the report, it was developed by “drawing on actual experiences, firsthand observations, and reports provided to the PTV/VRD [LDF’s Prepared to Vote/Voting Rights Defender project] staff. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:20 am
PAPER: "Free Speech Culture as an Anticipatory 'Reasonable Accommodation' for People with Psycho-social Disabilities and Neurodiverse People"PUBLISHED: SSRN (October 2023)AUTHOR: Reuben Kirkham, Lecturer, Monash University & Free Speech Union of AustraliaABSTRACT: This paper begins a conversation about the relationship between disability rights and free speech. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:27 pm
Federal procurement law includes contracting preferences for service-disabled, veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSBs). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Elder and Disability Law in Massachusetts (MCLE) (Lexis+ / Lexis) Hundreds of insights, from Massachusetts’ most experienced practitioners, bring clarity to complex procedures and guide readers through the topics that are pertinent to elders and persons with disabilities--both adults and children. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
[Justice Kavanaugh was right. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 8:19 pm
The vast majority of childhood mental disabilities do not abate over time. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
Defendant “disabled his electronic monitoring device approximately an hour after another murder was committed two weeks earlier in the same area of Wilmington . . . [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Mississippi law does not require any notice to property owners, who have only a 10-day window to challenge a blight designation. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 12:30 pm
Eighth Circuit (this week): That seems right—back then. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
Employers would be well advised to recognize the right of workers to request reasonable accommodation for disabilities and to receive reasonable accommodation for disabilities absent undue hardship and direct threat. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 10:59 am
We welcome applications from outstanding candidates in all curricular areas, but have particularly strong teaching needs in bankruptcy, intellectual property, tax, and civil and political rights, in addition to classes in the first-year curriculum. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
Mississippi River floods over roadways. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:40 am
“Employers would be well advised to recognize the right of workers to request reasonable accommodation for disabilities and to receive reasonable accommodation for disabilities absent undue hardship and direct threat. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:25 pm
” In response to the law, Disability Rights Mississippi, along with other voter organizations, sued to enjoin it. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
This decision found that this presumption is unconstitutional as it violates the right to equal protection. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Chief District Court Judge Mark Walker blocked a new election law pushed by Republicans that puts restrictions on voter registration groups, calling it “Florida’s latest assault on the right to vote. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court agreed to decide what protections Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides to employees who contend they were the victim of a discriminatory transfer. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
Rahimi contended that his conviction violated his Second Amendment rights. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
Rudisill now seeks review, arguing that the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Federal Circuit panel got it right, and that the limitation of Section 3327(d)(2) does not apply to veterans with multiple periods of service. [read post]
