Search for: "Dodd v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 12:49 pm
Somers, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided that employees who raise internal complaints about possible violation of securities laws are not protected as whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:36 pm
By Brian Neil Hoffman and Jeremy Ben Merkelson Brian Neil Hoffman The United States Supreme Court today narrowed the universe of plaintiffs who can claim protection under the whistleblower anti-retaliation provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:36 pm
By Brian Neil Hoffman and Jeremy Ben Merkelson Brian Neil Hoffman The United States Supreme Court today narrowed the universe of plaintiffs who can claim protection under the whistleblower anti-retaliation provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:28 am
"There is absolutely nothing in the [statute], or in the legislative history of the Dodd-Frank Act, that suggests that Congress intended the antiretaliation provision to regulate the relationships between foreign employers and their foreign employees working outside the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
That’s the message the United States Supreme Court sent to whistleblowers with its decision yesterday in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:53 am
Date: December 31, 2019 On December 16, 2019 Petitioner Erin Daly filed a petition for writ of certiorari to have the United States Supreme Court review the 2nd Circuit ruling of Daly v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:27 am
This conventional wisdom springs from a long-standing legal tradition, originating with McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:34 am
McCoy have published an alert about the United States Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling narrowing the class of would-be whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 6:33 am
Does the new Dodd-Frank law's provision regarding extraterritorial jurisdiction expand the reach of US Courts to prosecute foreign nationals for conduct occurring outside the United States? [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:09 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm
No. 4:19-cv-02572-JSW, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:54 pm
United States that the Sarbanes-Oxley accounting law’s prohibition on evasive destruction of “tangible objects” cannot be used to prosecute a fisherman who discarded undersized grouper in hopes of avoiding enforcement. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently decided that the SEC did not have the power to impose collateral bars on conduct pre-July 2010. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:24 pm
In Meng-Lin Liu v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:24 pm
In Meng-Lin Liu v. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
On Monday the Supreme Court decided Dodd v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:43 am
Energy United States, LLC, that an employee who only reports a suspected violation internally is not a protected whistleblower for the purposes of Dodd-Frank’s anti-relation provision. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:37 am
Jason Howard, J.D.The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has determined that a former UBS employee's testimony before FINRA did not equate to providing information to the SEC as required by the Dodd-Frank Act’s definition of “whistleblower” (Price v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:38 am
On Thursday, September 10, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its highly anticipated decision in Berman v. [read post]