Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-100"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,730
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 3:00 am
Moore, 366 N.C. 100, 105 (2012) (trial court erred in admitting testimony from a law enforcement officer that after he read defendant his Miranda rights, defendant “refused to talk about the case at that time” ); cf. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Indeed, how could legal advice that was not negative about the Commission’s proposal make it more difficult to defend the eventually adopted Regulation in court (Judgment, para 75)? [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
If the case does not settle, the court is likely to grapple with the issue of valuation of the damaged pieces. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm
It is also true that other adjusters are going to be as reasonable as they can be if 1) you know how to approach them and 2) you know the information that will give them the ability to give you what you want. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm
It is also true that other adjusters are going to be as reasonable as they can be if 1) you know how to approach them and 2) you know the information that will give them the ability to give you what you want. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm
It is also true that other adjusters are going to be as reasonable as they can be if 1) you know how to approach them and 2) you know the information that will give them the ability to give you what you want. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
My defendants, I told myself, were stupid to get caught. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:57 am
A pattern of such violations are punishable by a fine of no less than $100 (and the bill is currently silent on maximum penalties). [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
From today's Fourth Circuit opinion in Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
From today's Fourth Circuit opinion in Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:00 am
Many judges defend these events as helpful forums to discuss important issues, and they reject criticism that a stay at a fancy hotel could influence their decisions. [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Newmark, 16 A.3d 1, 34 (Del. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 4:25 pm
USC President Carol Folt defended her decision in a message to the USC community Friday. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:41 pm
This was a big case with Wood alleging that the defendants had made 100 million bricks and 100 million tiles using his patented process. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
It could be the most consequential development in Canadian legal regulation in more than 100 years. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The first, the Sixth Circuit’s “authority or duty” test, required plaintiffs to prove “state action” by establishing that either (1) the “text of state law requires an officeholder to maintain a social-media account,” (2) the defendant official “use[s] … state resources” or “government staff” to run the account, or (3) the “accoun[t] belong[s] to an office, rather than an individual officeholder. [read post]
