Search for: "Does I & II"
Results 1 - 20
of 23,526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 6:00 pm
Yet Brazil does not mean to step into the role of opponent, in the style of Cuba. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
II. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
II. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
That does not mean that I approve of the practice as a policy matter, but the question, in my view, rests with a president in using the authority granted under Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, which defines the pardon power as allowing a president to “grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am
In relation to (i) and (ii), Nicoventures submitted that the arguments and evidence presented at the UPC might influence both the outcome and the scheduling of the EPO proceedings. [read post]
21 May 2024, 7:58 pm
HHS found that while marijuana is associated with a high prevalence of abuse of nonmedical use, epidemiological indicators suggest that the drug does not produce negative outcomes as serious as those compared with schedule I or II drugs. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:05 pm
In Laborem Exercens (1981), Pope Saint John Paul II focuses on work from a personalist perspective, writing that work is “probably the essential key to the whole social question. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:49 pm
It does not fully consider restrictions on types of uses (e.g. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:27 pm
” The Court dismissed plaintiff’s claims under Section 631(a) based in large part on its determinations that (i) using a cell phone’s web browser does not constitute a “telephonic communication” and (ii) the alleged code was not necessarily used to intercept customer communications “while”they were “in transit,” rather than to store such communications after they were received by Boscov’s. [read post]
21 May 2024, 10:46 am
As summarized in our blog post analyzing the Prior Notice, which may be found here, the Domestic Content Bonus Requirements are satisfied if (i) 100% of any steel or iron that is a component of a project was produced in the United States (the “Steel or Iron Requirement”), (ii) at least the adjusted percentage (which differs based on when construction of a project begins and the type of project, but for most projects is 40% if construction begins this year) of… [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
In resisting the application for a preliminary injunction, Hanshow argued that (i) claim features 1.1, 7 and 8.4 were not realised in the contested products, (ii) SES had not proved that Hanshow had offered or marketed these products, and (iii) EP 277 was invalid on the basis of obviousness and lack of novelty. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from Professor Marc I. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Incentive equity often takes the form of newly granted (i) options, (ii) restricted stock units and/or (iii) profits interests, and is typically subject to time-based and performance-based vesting. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:43 pm
In the context of both the ongoing evaluation of the Rome II Regulation and Brussels I-bis Regulation this has been flagged as a topic of interest. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:33 pm
Khan KC: Applications for arrest warrants in the situation in the State of Palestine Today I am filing applications for warrants of arrest before Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court in the Situation in the State of Palestine. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:32 am
HB 21 also requires express consent “every time the company” (i) transfers the biological sample or genetic data to a third party for a reason other than the provision of the product or service ordered, (ii) uses the biological sample or genetic data for a purpose other than the ordered product or service, or (iii) markets to a consumer based on the consumer’s genetic data. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
As she noted, “[w]hen the Constitution’s text does not provide a limit to a coordinate branch’s power, we should not lightly assume that Article III implicitly directs the Judiciary to find one. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
That does not mean that it is a foregone conclusion. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am
Chapter 1 – The Answer from Biology Chapter 2 – The Answer from Law Chapter 3 – The Answer from Progressive Advocacy Part II. [read post]
