Search for: "Does I through IX"
Results 1 - 20
of 692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 4:04 am
I’ve read the ones from 2011 and the changes by De Vos, and I can’t bear to read through them again. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
Does this unconstitutionally burden religious beliefs? [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
The Genocide Convention contains the duty to prevent genocide (Article I), and prohibits complicity in genocide (Article III(e)). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm
District court: I'm not convinced your health problems are related to this sleep stuff. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 3:36 pm
Again, without discussing the particular school case, Title IX does not somehow trump or override a party’s rights in a separate court. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
The Committee of Ministers has decided to adopt a transversal approach to artificial intelligence across the various sectors of the Council of Europe, establishing the Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) and tasking it with elaborating a [Framework] Convention on Artificial Intelligence and maintaining this approach through coordination with other intergovernmental committees and entities of the Organisation. * * * The Committee bases its work on the recommendations of its… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm
However, the BOI Rule does not automatically categorize directors as beneficial owners who exercise substantial control. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
This means that a previous report that interprets or applies a provision of the covered agreements does not have binding force in respect of a subsequent dispute. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
This means that a previous report that interprets or applies a provision of the covered agreements does not have binding force in respect of a subsequent dispute. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
ix. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
I would like to thank the authors for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
But it does not change the thrust of the act of identifying the plausible--one is looking for what one wants to find; that is the threshold of the plausible. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
It said that Israel should take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all the acts of genocide listed in paragraphs (a) through (e) of Article II of the Genocide Convention. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Such solemn proceedings have the minimum value of forcing the international community to confront the problem of armed conflicts that it must confront, even if the only way left to do that is through the international judicial system established precisely to resolve international disputes, where judges must necessarily cut through the political noise and partisan bias to answer questions of law. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am
” G.S. 7B-4001, Article I, (b)(3). [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
The second is the substantive point, which the German state has already disclosed: Whatever criminal activity might be surmised from the conduct of belligerents in this conflict (including the complicity of organs of the United Nations and its officials, asserted but as yet unproven), that activity, when solely focused on a narrative curated from selected speech/acts of a number of individuals acting through the organs of the State of Israel, that activity does not rise to… [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:39 am
Notably, the court concludes that if there is to be any change in the understanding of the word “sex” in Title IX, it should come from the legislature rather than a court (or a bureaucrat in a government agency, which goes without saying but I’m saying it anyway). [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm
It also does not cast any doubt on Plaintiffs' claims regarding the sincerity of how they identify, nor can it on 12(b)(6) review. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm
Mass. 1-11-24) (complaint) (1) As in previous complaints related to university antisemitism, I find that the strongest claims are that (a) the university refuses to enforce its own, content-neutral, rules (In this context, for example, I can't see any legitimate reason for HLS to allow pro-Hamas students to take over Casperson lounge); and (b) the university reacts quite differently to complaints of antisemitism than it does to complaints of other sorts of bias,… [read post]
