Search for: "Don Stark"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,028
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2017, 10:20 am
Kirk Stark (UCLA) & Eric Zolt (UCLA), We Don’t Need Tax Cuts for the Middle Class: Amid the partisan rancor surrounding the framework for tax reform developed by GOP congressional leaders, there is one area of remarkable consensus: lower taxes for the middle class. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:47 am
If you just don’t get Stark, you’re not alone. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:47 am
If you just don’t get Stark, you’re not alone. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 9:00 am
The services can’t be referred out to people wo don’t work for the group. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
It is often used when the other exceptions don’t apply Medical staff incidental benefits. [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 9:00 am
You don’t want to get on the wrong side of this one. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
Also, the federal and state authorities that enforce legal prohibitions against self-referral and kickbacks / fee-splitting, don’t think or act in terms of percentages of compliance. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:00 am
Fundamentally, you’re worried about legal rules prohibiting kickbacks, fee-splitting, corporate practice of medicine, as well as Stark law; you don’t know whether the MSO or management structure will work; you’d like to be as aggressive as possible yet not incur the huge civil (and sometimes criminal) penalties. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:00 am
Fundamentally, you’re worried about legal rules prohibiting kickbacks, fee-splitting, corporate practice of medicine, as well as Stark law; you don’t know whether the MSO or management structure will work; you’d like to be as aggressive as possible yet not incur the huge civil (and sometimes criminal) penalties. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 3:58 am
These developments highlight a stark reality of the Chinese legal system. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:05 pm
Remember, Stark is a strict liability statute so if you don’t meet all of the requirements of an exception, you likely have a violation of the statute and the penalties are draconian. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:01 pm
While we don't anticipate a speedy resolution, at least this is a sign of progress. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
A Definition and Framework Source: ComplexDiscovery The post A Stark Divide? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:48 pm
“If you don’t understand this reasoning, the fault lies with the Supreme Court, not you,” Lemieux writes. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 5:09 am
Siegelheim, member of Stark & Stark's Franchise group, Nathan R. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:01 pm
I don’t think it would fly, but . . . . [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 11:11 am
A stark tweet. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 7:47 am
Stark was strong! [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
"Why don't we use social networking to let him know that he can't keep elbowing his progressive base -- the people who got him the nomination -- away from the policy table? [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:37 am
My friends the Starks have their World Cup Soccer blog up and running -- it's called The Cup Running Over, and it's worth a look and a bookmark, even if you don't call it "football. [read post]
