Search for: "GARCIA v. WYETH" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 1994 WL 532091, at *1 (E.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:51 am by Bexis
  Buckmanpreempted the exception (see Garcia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm by Eric Alexander
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), was right on the Michigan statute where Desiano v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm by Eric Alexander
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), was right on the Michigan statute where Desiano v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
We've written about this issue before, discussing another pair of cases, with the good one being Garcia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127 (Mich. 2003)) or the Sixth Circuit (Garcia v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:27 am by Will
The opinion is also notable for its cursory smackdown of the plaintiff’s “fraud on the FDA” claim, and wholehearted embrace of Garcia v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:21 am by Steve McConnell
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), and the anti-preemption position set forth by the Second Circuit in Desiano v. [read post]