Search for: "Green v. Gray, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
A highly magnified view of the key area from the above screenshot: As between the webpage [the other plaintiff] viewed, sandwiched between the buttons allowing Russell to select her gender and the large green “continue” button were the same two lines of text in tiny gray front stating, “I understand and agree to the Terms and Conditions which includes mandatory arbitration and Privacy Policy. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am
The refusal cites documentsD1: TSAI D-M ET AL: "The evaluation of normalized cross correlations for defect detection", PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 24, no. 15, November 2003, pages 2525-2535D2: TSAI D-M ET AL: "Fast normalized cross correlation for defect detection", PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 24, no. 15, November 2003, pages 2625-2631D3: R. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Green New Deal. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Gray, 2 Atk. 286, 26 Eng. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
Aston Martin, et al. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(Just an Examiner) Clean tech in court: Green patent complaint update (Green Patent Blog) Guest post: Mark Twain’s patent interference (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC on BPAI in In re Leithem: “This conclusory analysis is hardly persuasive (IPBiz) CAFC finds construction of term unnecessary: Respironics v Invacare (nonprecedential) (GRAY on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking statute is constitutional: Luka… [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
Martin, et al. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Braun Melsungen AG, et. al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
Johnson & Johnson, et. al. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Phoenix Trading, Inc., et. al. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Entertainment, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
Ratermann Manufacturing et al. [read post]
