Search for: "In re: E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2024, 11:45 am by Robert Zulandt
  Relying on and analyzing the “likelihood of confusion” factors set forth in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., the TTAB denied ROGUE’s request for cancellation. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
(In re Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Prods.Liab.Litig.) (8th Cir. 2021) 9F.4th 768, 778–780 [concluding it was not unreliable for an expert to rely on a study to draw an inference of causation even though the study found that the association did not establish causation, “so long as the expert does the work ‘to bridge the gap between association and causation’”].) [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Some notes on vexing issue, which fortunately has never serious issue for me. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:55 am by Jon L. Gelman
“The corporations we’re suing knew full well the potential harms they were inflicting on our environment, but chose to forge ahead anyway. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:01 pm by dbllawyers
  References [6] In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).[7] In re Mighty Leaf Tea, 601 F.3d 1342, 94 USPQ2d 1257, 1259 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by Nikki Siesel
In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am by Jon L. Gelman
DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8 PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION, 939 F. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 2:26 pm by James Hastings
  To do so, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board looks to a 13-part test set forth in the seminal case  In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973) (the “DuPont Factors”). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:09 pm by James Hastings
   In Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases,  the plaintiff must establish the presence of a likelihood of confusion between the parties’ trademarks pursuant to the thirteen factors set forth in the case of In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., et al., No. 15-1055 (antitrust reverse payment – appeal from the 3rd Cir.) 3. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 10:22 am by Amy Abeloff and Robert B. Milligan
DuPont de Nemours and Company and Corning, Incorporated, as well as an expert on trade secret law, and a professor specializing in trade secret academia. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:54 pm by Schachtman
Du Pont De Nemours & Company (DuPont), for alleged harm from environmental exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid or its salts (PFOA). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  SJS/TEN is somewhat analogous in our sandbox to mesothelioma in asbestos cases, since plaintiffs often work backwards from the diagnosis to look for some drug company to sue. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 8:40 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
 In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 2008 WL 162156, at *6 (W.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Thus, in In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 489 F. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 851 F. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:02 am by Sean Wajert
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., No. 719, 2009 (Del. 7/11/11). [read post]