Search for: "In re LinkedIn User Privacy Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 7:01 am
This approach aims to address law firms’ concerns about data privacy and control while still harnessing the power of AI. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am
A company called Clearview AI has scraped the internet to gather (without consent) 30 billion images to support a tool that lets users identify people by picture alone. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am
LinkedIn case, which up until now was the most important case in the history of US web-scraping litigation. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
If nothing else, litigants know where they stand in these jurisdictions. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm
He provides insight into the technology’s development and potential while emphasizing understandable user interaction. [read post]
16 May 2023, 10:48 am
He also sees opportunities to use the tools to help pro se litigants and courts. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 3:13 pm
If you’re productive 90% of the time you’re in the office, you’re going to complete that work in 1,780 hours. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 11:34 am
One focus that Reihl stresses, however, is that unlike the public AI chat tools, Lexis’ approach will take in the issues of privacy, security, citation of sources, and the ability to understand how their tools get to the results its users see. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:09 pm
And if we can explain it to our users, and it’s reproducible, man, it’s stable man doesn’t do all kinds of strange. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
It also puts users’ privacy and security (including minors’!) [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:55 am
Or, for that matter, hiQ Labs, who has effectively been run out of business by their ongoing litigation with LinkedIn, and who has been on the losing end of almost every key legal decision in their dispute with LinkedIn. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
We’re here to discuss the recent Ninth Circuit oral argument in the Epic Games, the Apple case. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 11:45 pm
"9to5Mac: iOS privacy concerns deepen as Apple’s promises on analytics anonymity appear to be false"The same researchers have now demonstrated that Apple can – despite assurances to the contrary – link this data back to individual users, as the same ID is used as that for iCloud accounts …"The Verge: iOS developers say Apple’s App Store analytics aren’t anonymous"The finding exposes the difference between the privacy… [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
As smaller app developers, we need stores operated by big players in whose security and privacy promises consumers will trust--and who can get a high percentage of all smartphone users to register. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 11:34 am
That may make it harder for Apple to score points with its security and privacy pretexts. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 3:44 pm
His view of how the legal information industry will change in the next two to five years revolves around how the information is delivered to the end users. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:26 am
Regulation and litigation--and, if necessary, legislation--can address the problem.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 11:03 pm
It was a major mistake--though easily explained against the political backdrop--that too many politicians and regulators initially let Apple get away with its "privacy" pretext.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:32 am
So we’re now seeing the fallout of 40 years of lax enforcement. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 1:51 am
If all else fails, you can then talk to litigation funders--and maybe even to Morgan Chu. [read post]
