Search for: "Interstate Commerce of Florida, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
Am., LLC v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
LLC, No. 23-51 (Sup. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
As always, “[o]uranalysis begins and ends with the text,” Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
LePage Bakeries Park Street, LLC (Feb. 20) – Whether the Federal Arbitration Act’s exemption for the employment contracts of “workers engaged in interstate commerce” applies to any worker who is “actively engaged” in the interstate transportation of goods, or whether the worker’s employer must also be in the “transportation industry. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am
McNeil Consultants LLC, 2023 WL 5600128 (N.D. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:38 pm
LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
Case Citation: Nursing CE Central, LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
The report noted numerous lobbyist meetings that were not reported as required and raised concerns about the close relationship between the city and the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Brown Engstrand & Shely LLC, No. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
The internet, and related e-commerce, can certainly be interstate in nature. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:34 am
Club Exploria, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 2:47 am
Fourteen ill people are residents of Florida, and eleven reported traveling to Florida prior to illness onset. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
The introduction of an adulterated food into interstate commerce is prohibited. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Section 5(b) of the Securities Exchange Act makes it unlawful for any person to directly or indirectly: (a) make use of means or instrumentalities of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell, through the use or medium of a prospectus or otherwise, securities as to which no registration statement was in effect; (b) for the purpose of sale or delivery after sale, carry or cause to be carried through the mails or in interstate… [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 11:00 am
To allow for interstate application of the FTSA would violate the Commerce and Dormant Commerce Clauses (another good argument to make and supported by a 2009 Southern District of Florida decision finding that Florida’s Caller ID Anti-Spoofing Act violated such constitutional provisions (TelTech Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
See NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
The Dormant Commerce Clause balancing test (the Pike v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
These and other complexities must at least be considered by Fox's legal team; even having to consider them is thus a cost of interstate business. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:37 am
When, if ever, must courts reject such laws as unduly burdening interstate commerce in violation of the Dormant Commerce Clause? [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:34 am
Case citation: Las Vegas Skydiving Adventures LLC v. [read post]