Search for: "JOHN N. GRAHAM" Results 1 - 20 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by bklemm@foley.com
” Further, “[i]n keeping with the flexible approach to obviousness in KSR and Graham, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to crafting an obviousness rejection. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:44 pm by Jack Bogdanski
Rob Nosse, Oregon House District 42*District Attorney Mike Schmidt, Multnomah County*Sheriff Nicole Morrisey O’Donnell, Multnomah CountyJudge Cheryl Albrecht, Multnomah County Circuit CourtMayor Ted Wheeler, city of Portland*Candace Avalos, Verde*John Bishop, Media-GenerationLaura Brown, Central City ConcernLisa Clark, Petunias Pies and PastriesSuperintendent Casey Codding, Oregon State PolicePatrick Criteser, Tillamook County Creamery Association*Bob Day, incoming Portland Police… [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
Bush Administration OIRA head Susan Dudley and former EPA policy official Brian Mannix write that, “[i]n principle, a benefit-cost analysis should be ‘complete. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Chief Justice John Roberts Defends Supreme Court’s ‘Highest Standards of Conduct,’ Offers No New Rules ABC News – Devin Dwyer | Published: 5/24/2023 Chief Justice John Roberts defended the integrity of the Supreme Court in the face of slumping public approval and growing political pressure after a recent barrage of misconduct allegations. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 10:08 am by Avery Schmitz
The event will feature remarks from John J. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by Dominic Solari
The three-judge panel—consisting of Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson,  Gregory Katsas, Neomi Rao—heard from counsel for Perry, John Rowley, as well as Justice Department lawyer John Pellettieri. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Michael Stern
One significant issue of categorization, flagged by Wright and Goodman, relates to the role played by John Eastman, who pushed Pence to take an active role in the counting of the electoral vote and upend the process in favor of Trump. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
Lindsey Graham, Case 22-12696 (11th Cir. 2022), denial of application for stay and an injunction pending appeal by Supreme Court (Nov. 1, 2022). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
Emma Graham-Harrison provides analysis for the Guardian. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
The LSE Media Blog featured an article by Dr Sebastián Lehuedé, postdoctoral scholar at the Centre of Governance and Human Rights, highlighting Big Tech’s problematic environmental record. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:41 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:20 am by Emma Snell
Michael Schwirtz and John Ismay report for the New York Times. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:56 am by Justin Cole
Michel Paradis, a senior attorney at the Department of Defense representing Guantanamo detainees, has previously argued that “[a]n ex post facto challenge to the retroactive removal of the War Crime Act’s nationality loophole would not be a hard case to win. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:34 am by Emma Snell
Paul Sonne and John Hudson report for the Washington Post. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Landmark Supreme Court Fight Over Social Media Now Looks Likely MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 9/19/2022 Conflicting lower court rulings about removing controversial material from social media platforms point toward a landmark U.S. [read post]