Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
Department of Health and Human Services that administers health care programs for tribes. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
In ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
” The Christian Legal Society and Robertson Center for Constitutional Law, Concerned Women for America, and Judicial Watch, Inc. make similar arguments, urging the court to overturn Roe and Casey on principles of state sovereignty and federalism. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
In 2019, based on Rust, the Department of Health and Human Services instituted new referral and separation provisions. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
Class Action Securities Lawsuit Filings Declined in 2020 After Three Years of Record Filing Levels The number of securities class action lawsuits filed each year is a particularly closely watched metric in the D&O liability arena, because for most publicly traded companies securities suits are the most significant potential source of D&O liability, and because the number of suits filed directly affects the aggregate claims loss results of the D&O insurance… [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
There are many transcripts and documents that were offered in open judicial proceedings, without any protective or confidentiality orders. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
It is a discursive universe in which politics was presumed to be a dirty word, and that it was to be made palatable only through the benign and watchful management of law. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am
Allina Health Services – both administrative law cases addressing steps the government must take to justify certain actions. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
I normally try to have Relist Watch written up by Wednesday after the court issues its order list. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Courts of Appeals for the 4th, 8th, 9th and 10th Circuits hold; and (3) whether the portion of Trans World Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Midwesco Enterprises, Inc., the Supreme Court held that this Ohio provision imposes an “impermissible burden on commerce” when applied to non-residents, forcing the out-of-state corporation involved there to the choice of either appointing a resident agent in Ohio for service of process or remaining subject to suit in Ohio in perpetuity. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Three other new relists involve challenges to the Defense Department’s policy respecting transgender service members, under which those found to have gender dysphoria would generally be barred from military service: Trump v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:13 am
To that end, the bill expressly affirms or rejects specified judicial decisions in: Harris v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
American International Group, Inc. v. [read post]
