Search for: "Jammie Thomas"
Results 1 - 20
of 877
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
Jammie Thomas-Rasset was the first end-user to bring a case to a jury trial in a P2P file-sharing case, after she was sued by Capitol Records in 2006 for downloading and sharing 24 songs via KaZaa. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 2:38 pm
In the recent ruling against Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the jury awarded the RIAA $1.92 million USD, on only 24 tracks. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 11:41 am
The problem with this approach is that it results in cases like the one against Jammie Thomas-Rasset, who now has (there are indications that the RIAA is still willing to settle with a much lower amount of money, but it’s irrelevant; what’s important is the principle of the matter) to pay 1.92 million dollars for infringing the copyright of 24 songs. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:59 am
A lower court judge made a similar ruling in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case, which prompted repeated retrials on damages. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 1:31 pm
(See Ben Sheffner’s post about the Thomas-Rasset case: “Labels reject remittitur, opt for third trial on damages in Jammie Thomas-Rasset case. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 2:03 pm
This is why experts have touted bankruptcy as a possible out for both Joel Tennenbaum and Jammie Thomas-Rasset. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm
UPDATE: Remember Jammie Thomas? [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
Sandwiched in between stories on biologics and the nomination of David Kappos to Director of the USPTO, was a story about Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the Minnesetoan mother who illegally downloaded and shared 24 songs and was ordered to pay $1.92 million to four major musical labels. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:46 pm
A website owner who copied two copyrighted poems, earning no profit and causing no more than minuscule economic harm, was ordered to pay $300,000.1 More famously, single mother Jammie Thomas-Rasset was ordered to pay $222,000 for sharing 24 songs online, even though the trial judge believed that the record labels' actual harm was about $50.2. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:56 am
(See Ben Sheffner’s post about the Thomas-Rasset case: “Labels reject remittitur, opt for third trial on damages in Jammie Thomas-Rasset case. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:59 am
Department of Commerce Public Meeting: Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy United States Patent and Trademark Office – Madison Auditorium Live webcast available at: https://new.livestream.com/uspto/copyright The Appropriate Calibration of Statutory Damages: Individual File Sharers and Secondary Liability Moderator: Darren Pogoda, Attorney‐Advisor for Copyright, Office of Policy and International Affairs, USPTO Panelists: David Sohn, Center for Democracy… [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:33 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: RIAA Wants Infamous File-Sharer to Campaign Against Piracy First off today, David Kravets at Wired reports that famed file sharer Jammie Thomas-Rasset was approached by the record labels with a proposition to receive a reduction in the damages she owes in exchange for her becoming a spokesperson for the RIAA and their anti-piracy efforts. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:15 pm
The most famous verdict against a file-sharer, in the Jammie Thomas case, finally ended three months ago when the Supreme Court refused to hear her case. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:54 pm
Another file sharer, Jammie Thomas-Rasset, famously went through three different trials on damages and, each time, was subject to a different judgment, ranging from $222,000 to $1.92 million. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 9:57 am
* Jammie Thomas says she would do it all over again [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 2:26 pm
We have a ruling in the Kirtsaeng textbook case, the end of the line for Jammie Thomas-Rasset and similar bad news for iviTV. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 1:23 pm
The Supreme Court has denied cert in the case of Jammie Thomas-Rasset, a native American who uploaded, downloaded... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:03 am
However, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, ruled in favor of Kirtsaeng, reversing two lower court rulings and making it clear that that first sale applies even if the product was produced abroad. 2: Supreme Court Won’t Review TV Streaming, File-Sharing Rulings Next up today, Eriq Gardner at The Hollywood Reporter Esquire reports that, in the midst of the excitement about the ending of the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case and the Wiley case, another denied petition by the… [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
DeVoy The United States Supreme Court declined to hear the case of Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the Minnesota woman famously sued by the RIAA (sub nom Capitol Records) in 2006 during its multi-year litigation campaign. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
DeVoy The United States Supreme Court declined to hear the case of Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the Minnesota woman famously sued by the RIAA (sub nom Capitol Records) in 2006 during its multi-year litigation campaign. [read post]
