Search for: "John/Jane Doe #9"
Results 1 - 20
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:23 am
Indiana Univ.: Loyola University Chicago expelled John Doe after concluding that he had engaged in sexual activity with Jane Roe, a fellow student, without her properly obtained consent. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm
Although we must prepare for confronting dodgy methods in front of jury, asking for scientific due process that intervenes and decides the methodological issues with well-reasoned, written opinions in advance of trial does not seem like too much. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:20 am
One needs to look no further than Mark Rose, Authors and Owners, or Adrian Johns, The Nature of the Book. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:40 am
In contrast, consider a scenario where Jane and John, a couple married for 10 years, decide to separate. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm
CLAIMANT’S VERIFIED MOTION FOR SUMMARY FINAL ORDER WITH REGARD TO SECTION 440.13(2)(f) REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF PHYSICIAN Claimant, JANE DOE, by and through her undersigned attorney, files this, Claimant’s Verified Motion for Summary Final Order. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 pm
The apparently inadvertent posting of the docket entry does not appear to indicate any nefarious action. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am
Most of us take for granted that pseudonymous litigants will use the name “John Doe” or “Jane Roe,” but that gives rise to a problem. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
To give one example from the Ninth Circuit: The plaintiffs in this case previously were denominated "James Rowe, Jane Rowe and John Doe. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm
And so I think we just had a lot of experience in dicksterity Kind of what does it mean to try these things and to experimented and to do that? [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:49 pm
The Six things Bill Marler does not eat. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
" Had Plaintiff filed a complaint in which she identified herself as Jane Doe and Named Defendant as "John Doe"—i.e., providing anonymity both for herself and the accused—the Court would have granted the request for relief with little hesitation. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:37 pm
” The motorcade left the White House at 9:55 a.m. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:22 am
John Doe formed a relationship with a classmate whom we shall call “Jane Roe. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Jane gave birth to the child in question and placed it for adoption. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 7:11 am
She seeks to hold 73 named defendants and several Jane and John Does liable for the alleged defamation, including (1) the Times and entities and individuals associated with the Times—such as The Daily and its host; the Times's executive and business editors; and [Kashmir Hill, the author of the articles,] and her husband; (2) the alleged victims mentioned in the two articles; (3) individuals, entities, lawyers, and law firms who were involved in the defamation… [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am
A federal grand jury has started issuing subpoenas to people linked to the alternate elector plan, requesting information about several lawyers including Rudolph Giuliani and one of Trump’s legal advisers, John Eastman. [read post]
2 May 2022, 5:01 am
[T]he Court GRANTS Jane Doe's motion as it relates to redacting the minor victims' names from the February 9, 2006 opinion. [read post]
