Search for: "John Doe No. 98"
Results 1 - 20
of 489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
In 2017, Governor Hickenlooper’s Executive Order 2017-0015 directed the CDPHE to propose a state greenhouse gas reporting rule mirroring the then-current federal reporting rule at 40 CFR 98 with the goals of: Reducing GHG emissions statewide by more than 26% below 2005 by 2025; Reducing carbon dioxide emissions for the electricity sector by 25% below 2012 levels by 2025 and 35% below 2012 levels by 2030; and Reducing electricity sales by 2% by 2020 through cost-effective energy… [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
However, following self-interest does not automatically yield socially positive results when not channeled into productive work and investments that predictably redound to collective well-being. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:38 pm
United States, 98 F.3d 1314 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
John Fund v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
She was further reassured by the action that had been taken [98(a) to (e)] and trusted that the Acting Rector and Archdeacon would hold the petitioners to these commitments [98]. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:12 am
I was gonna say that it does not work for me. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:08 pm
It signaled what appeared to be the ending of a long arc of development with the abandonment of the project to produce a Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights (the “Norms”).[1] It was also the year that saw the announcement of the appointment of John Ruggie as Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprise… [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 6:18 pm
This post introduces the manuscript's Chapter 3 ("The Formation of Intent and the Foundation of Text: The Travaux Préparatoires of SRSG John G. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
Sen Ron Wyden: Wyden Introduces SAFE SEX Workers Study Act (Dec. 17, 2019) YouTube: DNI Clapper tells Wyden the NSA does not collect data on millions of Americans (March 12, 2013) Washington Post: Interview: Sen. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
The court held that Section 3 did notapply because the Presidency, which Section 3 does notmention by name, is not an “office . . . under the United3Cite as: 601 U. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
2 A First Reading of Definitive Text: The UNHRC Endorsement Resolution and the Endorsed UNGP The Guiding Principles were unveiled in two stages, separated by about half a year, by John G. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Nor is this constitutional and anti-SLAPP law protection lost because some small portion of the audience for a book, film, TV program, song, or even a video game does something harmful in a way that was misguidedly inspired by the speech. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
This is the second part of our response to Professor John Mikhail's Balkinization post. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
” As a recent article by John Vlahoplus&nb [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
It does not, however, fundamentally change our understanding of what the current iteration of the Roberts Court--led on hot-button issues by hard-right Justices and not John Roberts--is all about. [read post]
