Search for: "John Does I-IV" Results 1 - 20 of 838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2024, 8:58 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
This could be done by providing evidence that the practice: (i) does not materially degrade or threaten to materially degrade the BIAS of the general public; (ii) does not hinder consumer choice; (iii) does not impair competition, innovation, consumer demands, or investment; and (iv) does not impede any forms of expression, types of service, or points of view. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm by Michael Lowe
Federal Criminal Defense: Right to Counsel and Indigent Defense The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that “…[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall … have the Assistance of counsel for his defence. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Key Takeaway Unlike the 2016 rules, the Final Rule does not contain a specific, representation-based exception from fiduciary advice for interactions with sophisticated counterparties like other advice fiduciaries. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Ives [2024] ECC Tru 1] [Top of section] [Top of post] Re St. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Wang's posting of his genuinely held belief in Xu's alleged misconduct for the purpose of warning other students does not rise to the level of extreme and outrageous conduct under Illinois law…. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
In Part IV, I locate the tort of trespass within the wider firmament of tort law, and make the case that it is conceptually and normatively subordinate to the tort of battery. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
The Alien Enemies Act has been used three times, each involving a declared war: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]