Search for: "Kent v. USA"
Results 1 - 20
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
By: Laurie E. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
On the same day, Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Chief Constable of Kent v McLoughlin, KA-2023-000118. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
Kent State Univ., 212 F.3d 1272, 1282 (Fed. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
The M/V Miss Cissy (“Miss Cissy”), a 46.5-foot commercial vessel owned by Parker Drilling Offshore USA, LLC (“PDO”), was sailing on the waterway at the same time ahead of them. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm
More details of the event can be found here.9 December 2022 – The USPTO and the McCarthy Institute: “The Future of Trade Secret Law” (The Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Washington DC, USA)The USPTO and the McCarthy Institute will be holding the reception with a lecture in two parts, one to be delivered by the co-authors of the McCarthy Scholarship Award winning article “From Trade Secrecy to Seclusion” and one to be delivered by Judge Kent A. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2017]; Escape… [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 3:51 am
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2017]; Escape… [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Mazars USA — which involved congressional subpoenas — is a “mixed decision. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm
No surprise then, when Andrew Wakefield was run out of the U.K., he found a warm embrace in the USA from RFK Jr. and Jenny McCarthy. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
In Banister v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that “[w]henever the Supreme Court makes a significant change in the law — as it did last week when it overruled its prior approval of nonunanimous juries in state criminal cases” in Ramos v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger adds to the list of possible cases to replace Mathena v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger argues that “an essential issue in the case was barely mentioned” during the argument. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers his take on the output from Friday’s conference. [read post]
