Search for: "Lisa Bressman"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 7:07 pm
Lisa Schultz Bressman and Abbe Gluck have demonstrated that drafters overwhelmingly rely on Chevron. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:19 pm
Professor Lisa Schultz Bressman predicts that even if Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:56 am
Walters (Wisconsin Law Review forthcoming) Placing Legal Context in Context by Chad Squitieri (Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy Per Curiam forthcoming) Resilience in a Digital Age by Kristen Eichensehr & Danielle Keats Citron (University of Chicago Legal Forum forthcoming) Lower Courts After Loper Bright by Lisa Schultz Bressman (George Mason Law Review forthcoming) Will Federal Compassionate Release… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 7:16 am
The first is “Lower Courts After Loper Bright,” by Lisa Schultz Bressman. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
For example, as shown by the pioneering work of Abbe Gluck and Lisa Bressman, the Chevron doctrine represents a nearly unique example of an interpretive canon well known to and understood by the staff who draft legislation. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
This year’s committee was chaired by Tim Lytton, and its members were Kent Barnett, Lisa Bressman, Benjamin Eidelson, Sophia Lee, Ronald Levin, and Jed Stiglitz. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:45 am
This year, the chair of the committee was Professor Tim Lytton, and its members were Professors Kent Barnett, Lisa Bressman, Benjamin Eidelson, Sophia Lee, Ronald Levin, and Jed Stiglitz. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Chris Walker had the great idea to assemble a bibliography on the major questions doctrine (MQD) so that we can have a one-stop shop for all things MQD. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 9:03 pm
This series includes contributions from the following scholars: Lisa Schultz Bressman, Vanderbilt Law School; Susan E. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:24 pm
Adler, Conservative Minimalism and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Lisa Schultz Bressman, What Seila Law Says about Chief Justice Roberts's View of the Administrative State David A. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 3:30 am
Christopher Walker Inspired by Lisa Bressman and Abbe Gluck’s pioneering empirical study on how congressional staffers approach drafting statutes, I spent months in 2013 surveying federal agency rule drafters on how they interpret statutes and draft regulations. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 10:05 am
Louis 840 60 7 Martha Minow Harvard University 820 63 8 Jody Freeman Harvard University 800 54 9 Catharine MacKinnon University of Michigan 780 71 10 Rachel Barkow New York University 775 47 11 Kimberle Crenshaw Columbia University 710 59 12 Pamela Karlan Stanford University 670 59 13 Oona Hathaway Yale University 660 45 14 Heather Gerken Yale University 650 49 15-T Pamela Samuelson University of California-Berkeley 640 69 15-T Rochelle Dreyfuss New York… [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:35 pm
The Legislation and Regulation textbook by John Manning and Matthew Stephenson presents a very different vision of the first-year course compared to The Regulatory State textbook by Lisa Bressman, Edward Rubin, and Kevin Stack, for example. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 3:30 am
Walker’s article is modeled off of important empirical work Lisa Bressman and Abbe Gluck previously conducted that studied congressional drafters’ knowledge of and use of different administrative law doctrines and interpretive tools. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 10:48 am
Much recent writing (including work by Jody Freeman and Jim Rossi; Jacob Gersen, and my recent empirical work with Lisa Bressman) has focused on the increasing frequency with which Congress delegates to multiple agencies at once, so this is very much a live question. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:59 am
(forthcoming 2014) (both with Lisa Bressman)). 1. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Gluck and Lisa Schultz Bressman recently sought answers to this question (and many others). [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Gluck and Lisa Schultz Bressman recently sought answers to this question (and many others). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:06 am
In a forthcoming article based on an empirical study of congressional drafting (co-authored with Lisa Bressman), we have argued for a new “CBO canon”: An interpretive presumption that ambiguities in legislation should be construed in the way most consistent with the assumptions underlying the congressional budget score on which the initial legislation was based. [read post]
