Search for: "M. Bray"
Results 1 - 20
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 5:10 am
Working with an immigration lawyer like those at The Law Office of John M. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Bray as a possible supsect. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
I'm grateful to Christopher Linfante for transcription as [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:13 am
Another is changes in preliminary injunction practice that make forum-shopping easier (more on that in a paper I'm writing). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 am
I’m pleased to see the State rolling out this funding to help communities in New York improve their overall cybersecurity posture. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 am
I’m pleased to see the State rolling out this funding to help communities in New York improve their overall cybersecurity posture. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
The Supreme Court seems poised to reverse Colorado’s decision to exclude Donald Trump from its Republican presidential primary ballot on grounds other than that Trump did not take the right kind of oath to support the Constitution. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
[Justice Scalia erred because there are no “Officers of the United States” appointed outside Article II, Section II.] [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Balikian & Cody M. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
The next edition of Ames, Chafee, and Re on Remedies is off to the publisher (Foundation) for next fall, and I'm going to write a series of posts about the revision. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Bray, Multiple Chancellors: Reforming the National Injunction, 131 Harv. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 7:46 am
This comes up often in my profession when encountering the Braying Lawyer in their natural habitat. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
§706(2); see M. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Re & Christopher M. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:30 am
UPDATE: My coblogger Sam Bray has a somewhat different perspective on this: Here are the three relevant principles: Protect speech, because equity follows the law. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 3:28 am
” The Justice Department pointed out that the Biden argument was manifestly wrong since Margaret M. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
I’m not sure the doctrine has improved on the merits, but Nebraska is a bit more comprehensible. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 3:58 pm
"] I'm delighted to be able to pass along this response by Prof. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:20 am
Maybe I’m just forward thinking. [read post]
