Search for: "MISS ELIZABETH F/V" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
Bills That Got The Governor’s Nod SB 1162: Pay Data Reporting and Pay Scale Disclosures As we previously reported, SB 1162 expands existing requirements that employers with 100 or more employees provide the California Civil Rights Department (CRD, f/k/a the DFEH) with specified EEO-1 pay data. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
In Hebrews (11:1), Paul writes “[F]aith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:51 pm by Javier Dominguez
And even with the best of intentions, nondiverse groups are prone to miss something. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:12 pm by Staff
Morgan was the missing master of the F/V White Swan III. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:51 am by SHG
Estrada, 969 F.3d 1245, 1253 n.3 (11th Cir. 2020). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The husband’s seven-year term was presumably based on the formula for postdivorce maintenance set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(6)(f). [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons observes that “[i]f the remedial process is dragged out long enough, the [Ohio and Michigan] plaintiffs might miss their chance at relief before the 2020 election even if the Supreme Court affirms in the North Carolina and/or Maryland cases,” and he offers “a few strategic case-management suggestions for district courts looking to provide timelier relief. [read post]