Search for: "Marty Lawing"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
Marty, 185 Cal. [read post]
11 May 2024, 1:23 pm
The post CBP Hauls in Big Cash Seizures in Detroit appeared first on Great Lakes Customs Law. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
United States, the presidential immunity case (besides posts at this blog, see e.g. these posts by Jack Goldsmith and by Marty Lederman). [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 4:06 pm
Know Where You Stand appeared first on Focus Law LA. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
" Marty Lederman articulated this position after the Mueller investigation concluded. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:06 am
Learn more: https://t.co/5bjEq6qAhl pic.twitter.com/GesvYKeqxp — DFO Marty C. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Legislators in 22 mostly blue states have proposed 57 such bills so far this year, and two have become law. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
House Amends Campaign Finance Bills to Cover All Nonprofits and Require More Detailed Reports” by Peter Hall for Pennsylvania Capital-Star Ethics Arkansas: “Audit Says Arkansas Governor’s Office Potentially Violated Laws with $19,000 Lectern Purchase” by Andrew DeMillo (Associated Press) for Yahoo News National: “Supreme Court Divided Over Key Charge Against Jan. 6 Rioters and Trump” by Ann Marimow (Washington Post) for MSN… [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
Steve Vladeck (now at Texas), Michael Dorf (Cornell), and Marty Lederman (Georgetown). [* * *] I've been hearing some buzz about whether House Speaker John A. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
” Marty Irby is president of Competitive Markets Action, based in Washington, D.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
But the letter is an example of what transparency advocates say are gaps in the law that allow lawyers and lobbyists, including former officials, to avoid disclosing their advocacy for companies possibly subject to sanctions. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Mike DeWine Stands Behind Aide While She Stays Mum About Bribery Scandal” by Marty Schladen for Ohio Capital Journal Oklahoma: “New Ethics Commission Executive Director to ‘Renew Our Focus on Education'” by Michael McNutt for NonDoc The post Tuesday’s LobbyComply News Roundup appeared first on State and Federal Communications. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:51 pm
At “Dorf on Law,” Michael C. [read post]
SCOTUS Ducking the Trump Eligibility Question Now will Pressure the Court to Rule in his Favor Later
16 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
Term Limits argument is accepted, the only posture in which a court could ever hold that an insurrectionist is not a valid office holder would be in a case in which someone claims that an action the insurrectionist took--perhaps an insurrectionist President signing a bill into law that criminalizes certain conduct with which that someone is charged--was invalid because the insurrectionist didn't validly hold office. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:27 am
Celebrezze appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
(8) How do the foregoing and other federal constitutional questions interact with state law governing who can appear on a ballot? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm
Harper claim may really be legally meritless) appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:31 am
Marty Lederman recently has argued that the Electors Clause does not apply to presidential primaries because primaries elect delegates rather than electors. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
Because Marty focuses on the purely legal consequences of a decision affirming the Colorado Supreme Court and Bruce on the practical effects of such a decision as it's likely to be presented to the public.First, pro-Marty: All that affirming the Colorado Supreme Court decision means, legally, is that it's constitutionally permissible for a state to conclude, through its authorized processes, that Trump is disqualified from appearing on the ballot pursuant to state… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:55 pm
Nevertheless, in a post entitled "Marty Lederman's Fundamental Mistake of Law," he writes:[I]t does not follow, as [Marty] seems to suppose, that this principle also precludes Colorado from granting its Secretary of State the authority to exclude Trump from the state’s Republican primary if he is disqualified from the Presidency by the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
