Search for: "Mccormick v. Does et al" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
However, following self-interest does not automatically yield socially positive results when not channeled into productive work and investments that predictably redound to collective well-being. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Or does the nominee intend to serve as a faithful representative of an activist stockholder or a special interest group (favoring, for example, immediate voluntary carbon reduction or the elimination of plastic packaging)? [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See 2 George E.Dix, et al., McCormick on Evidence § 343 (7th ed. 2016).In the real-party-in-interest context, however, we see noparticular need to create a formal presumption—especially a presumption that would disfavor the partythat likely has inferior access to potential sources of proof.ANDThe next question then becomes: what must a patentowner do to sufficiently raise the issue? [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
Barclays Bank PLC, et al., 16-239. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 7:00 am by Docket Navigator
Redline Detection, LLC et al, 8-12-cv-01861 (CACD December 16, 2015, Order) (McCormick, M.J.) [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reverdy Johnson represented the appellants (Waring et al.) in Waring v. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 4:01 am by Steven Gursten
Stoddard, et al.) are once again decided on the basis of an accurate interpretation of Michigan law. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm by assoulineberlowe
Kennedy et al FLSD   Other   Civil Rights Americans   with Disabilities Act   Boehm et al v. [read post]