Search for: "Media Products, Inc. v. Does 1 - 49" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
Each drop is designed to create buzz and generate social media attention with an “exclusive” feel to their limited edition products.[9] Their business model relies on generating buzz and viral marketing, as opposed to traditional advertising. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
”[1] And today, a small group of some of the world’s most powerful corporations exercise complete control over that public square. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In a direct listing, however, the company does not typically issue new shares. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
It was prompted by the Small Business Incentives Act, and is “the product of [the Commission’s] evaluation of the impact of its rules and regulations on the ability of small businesses to raise capital. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Clark, 2022 SKCA 36; 2022 SCC 49 (40090) Karakatsanis J.: “We agree with Justice Leurer, in dissent, that a specific Hibbert type instruction (R. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 7:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’s Motion to Dismiss at 1–17, University of Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
This analysis shows, however, that consumption does not disappear, and that revenue from taxes on tobacco products is rarely used to offset harm caused by that consumption. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Rather, with respect to celebrities and world famous political figures, registration is denied based solely on the determinations that (1) “the public would recognize and understand the mark as identifying a particular living individual”; and (2) the record does not contain the famous person’s consent to register the mark.[1] Under this provision, the PTO routinely denies registration to marks that appear calculated to capitalize on the famous… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Alexander Pearl, Professor of Law, University of Oklahoma College of Law -- Jurisgenerative Actions of Tribal Nations and the “Field of Pain and Death” Brought by the Continued Imposition of Federal Legal Structures   Kimberlianne Podlas,Professor & Department Head, Department of Media Studies, UNC Greensboro--Reconsidering the Nomos in Today’s Media Environment     12:40-1:30--Lunch Remarks -- Guido Calabresi, Senior United States… [read post]