Search for: "Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
The automobile manufacturer and energy company intervenors that supported the waiver included Ford Motor Company, Volkswagen Group of America, BMW of North America, American Honda Motor Co., Volvo Car USA, the National Coalition for Advanced Transportation, Advanced Energy Economy, Calpine Corporation, National Grid USA, the New York Power Authority, and the Power Companies Climate Coalition. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Part of that legislation is an emphasis on boosting U.S. manufacturing. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Bartlett, The Reserve Mining Controversy (1980). [4] Reserve Mining Co v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, the court, applying Indiana law, granted summary judgment to a respirator manufacturer, on basis of the sophisticated intermediary defense, in a post-OSHA asbestos lung cancer case.[9] Similarly, in Bean v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:32 am
(Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing) Plant Showing an Employee Working on one of the Products. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
Co., 49 A.D.2d 250 (4th Dept. 1974) (distinguishing manufacturing and design defects, and pe [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm
A Minnesota labor union health care fund and individual consumers from around the US led the case against Takeda. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
The landowner in Hawkes purchased wetlands in northern Minnesota, seeking to mine them for peat moss used in landscaping. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
The landowner in Hawkes purchased wetlands in northern Minnesota, seeking to mine them for peat moss used in landscaping. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm
Last week I sent out a survey and asked the question, How The Heck Did YOU End Up in Workers’ Comp? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co., 243 U.S. 93 (1917), to support general jurisdiction by consent. [read post]
17 May 2015, 6:28 am
The law of obviousness under the Patents Act 1952 was originally messed up by the High Court in the ‘3M Case’ (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd [1980] HCA 9). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:48 am
.** US 6,428,838 titled Method for making a food product from the thigh of a bird or other animal and a food product resulting therefrom First claim: A method of making a food product, comprising: selecting a thigh of an animal, the thigh comprising a thigh bone at least partially surrounded with thigh meat, the thigh bone having a first end and a second end; partially deboning the thigh causing the first end of the thigh bone to extend from the thigh meat to form a handle for holding the food… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., No. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 126 F. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 669 P.2d 744, 748 (N.M. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 11:28 pm
They are:to replace the current test of innovative step with a ‘higher’ standard based on the High Court’s decision in the ‘3M case’ (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd [1980] HCA 9; to require that innovation patent owners request examination/certification before the third anniversary of lodgement of their innovation patent; and to exclude from protection by an innovation patent all… [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
., 712 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013), and Harden Manufacturing Corp. v. [read post]
