Search for: "O'MALLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2016, 1:41 am
The government also faced tough questioning from both Judge Dyk and Judge O'Malley on the workability of its proposal, and it significantly backed off from the position in its brief:United States: We believe that the existence of a confidentiality agreement is certainly relevant to the question of whether or not it makes the invention available to the public, but it's not dispositive. . . .Judge O'Malley:… [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
” The court thus distinguishes Walker v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
” The court thus distinguishes Walker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
(collectively, “MadStad”) filed suit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), its then director, David Kappos, in his official capacity, and the United States of America (collectively, “the Government”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm
Maybe the End of Times, for False Marking Suits Under the America Invents Act, "Only the United States may sue for statutory damages. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Judge O'Malley filed a concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part opinion.The majority opinion was written by Chief Judge Rader. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
[Readers: The question relating to the unionization of home-based employees was posed to my colleage, Joel O'Malley. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:44 am
Grady O'Malley. [read post]